Tsung-Hua Yang vs Jesper DE Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yang vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Tsung-Hua Yang vs Jesper DE Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yang has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yang, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 105/ 71), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5). Jong has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yang has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Yang 0 - 0 Jong
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tsung-Hua Yang | Jesper DE Jong |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tsung-Hua Yang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Fletcher Scott
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yuta Kikuchi
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Sigouin
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eric Hadigian
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joe Tyler
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Louroi Martinez
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Jesper DE Jong Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
47%
(
7 of
15)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
21
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jan Choinski
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Jesper De Jong
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
August Holmgren
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Jesper De Jong
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
20
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
97%
(
36 of
37)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Jesper De Jong
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jannik Sinner
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pedro Cachin
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
33 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
105)
120
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
72 of
123)
1st Serve %
50%
(
58 of
116)
7
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
48 of
58)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
34%
(
42 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more