Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tung-Lin Wu vs Ti Chen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wu vs Chen analysis and find out who is favored!
Tung-Lin Wu vs Ti Chen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wu has won 52.67% of points on his second serve, while Chen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wu, in recent form, has won 50.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.7% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wu has saved 58.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wu has won 49.09% of matches played (W/L 27/ 28), with Chen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 167/ 125), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Chen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 621/ 380), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Wu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.66% of matches (W/L 22/ 19), where as Chen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Wu winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Wu winning 5 and Chen winning 2. The last match between Wu and Chen was at the Zhangjiagang Challenger, 03-09-2018, Q2 round, Hard with Tung-Lin Wu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:25.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wu and Chen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wu winning 0 times and Chen 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Wu winning 1, and Chen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wu has played against opponents with an average rank of 294.47 while Chen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wu has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wu has converted 40.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wu 2 - 1 Chen
257
Rank
158
High
25
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
184
High
40
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
55% (224-187)
Career Total W/L
60% (683-461)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$106,780
Career Prize Money
$57,495
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Ti Chen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 36 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:25 | 2:1:25 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (122/213) | 64% (126/198) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (84/122) | 65% (82/126) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (46/91) | 46% (33/72) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (10/14) | 57% (8/14) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (83/198) | 39% (83/213) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ti Chen
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ti Chen
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Ti Chen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (18/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (194/192) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 41 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:15 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 243.82 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (812/1240) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (540/812) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (221/428) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (49/117) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (438/1176) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tung-Lin Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Cash Hanzlik
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
98)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
106
Total Points Won
85
|
6-0 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Ti Chen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Ti Chen
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rishi Reddy
Player
Ti Chen
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 3-6 10-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Ti Chen
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
17 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Geun Jun Kim
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 7-5 10-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tsung-Hua Yang
Player
Ti Chen
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
64
|
6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Luca Castelnuovo
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Ti Chen
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ti Chen
Player
Han-Chih Lin
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Wu Vs Chen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
