Tyler Zink vs Quinn Vandecasteele Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zink vs Vandecasteele analysis and find out who is favored!
Tyler Zink vs Quinn Vandecasteele Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zink has won 44% of points on his second serve, while Vandecasteele has won 46.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zink, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vandecasteele has won 50.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.71% and 33.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zink has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vandecasteele has saved 53.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zink has won 28.57% of matches played (W/L 4/ 10), with Vandecasteele winning 67.35% (W/L 33/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zink has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 24/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Vandecasteele has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 41/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Zink has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9), where as Vandecasteele has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 28/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zink winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zink winning 2 and Vandecasteele winning 1. The last match between Zink and Vandecasteele was at the M15 Champaign, 22-06-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Tyler Zink getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zink and Vandecasteele have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zink winning 1 times and Vandecasteele 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zink winning 0, and Vandecasteele 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zink has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.57 while Vandecasteele has played against players with an average rank of 152.04.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zink has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vandecasteele has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zink has converted 16.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vandecasteele has converted 44.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zink 1 - 0 Vandecasteele
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
874
Rank
781
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
566
Rank
565
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
44% (33-42)
Career Total W/L
58% (49-36)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zink VS Vandecasteele H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Tyler Zink | Quinn Vandecasteele |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 19 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zink VS Vandecasteele H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 3-6 10-8 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tyler Zink | Quinn Vandecasteele |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (9/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (87/84) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.65 |
Aces Total | 0 | 54 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
DFs Total | 0 | 27 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:54:8 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 130.14 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 53% (311/588) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (210/311) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (131/277) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 47% (26/55) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (221/537) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Tyler Zink Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Learner Tien
Player
Tyler Zink
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Keegan Smith
Player
Tyler Zink
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
19
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
William Grant
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Tyler Zink
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alfredo Perez
Player
Tyler Zink
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
82)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Szymon Kielan
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Quinn Vandecasteele Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Mitchell Harper
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
James Duckworth
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Mitchell Krueger
50%
(
53 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
85 of
131)
12
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
53 of
85)
43%
(
23 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
131)
120
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
50%
(
55 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
112)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
56%
(
30 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
41 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Matias Soto
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
2
Aces
18
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Jacob Brumm
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pawit Sornlaksup
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
43%
(
36 of
84)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Bryce Nakashima
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
47%
(
50 of
106)
8
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
7
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
38%
(
23 of
60)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more