Valeria Savinykh vs Aruzhan Sagandikova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recently, Sagandikova has been performing better on their second serve, winning 38.9% of points compared to Savinykh's 30.3%. How significant is the second serve performance in predicting outcomes? It is highly correlated with match results.
• Sagandikova excels in winning points on opponents' second serves, securing 46.47%, while Savinykh surpasses with 53.66%. For first serve returns, Savinykh again leads with 33.93% against Sagandikova's 29.86%.
• Savinykh shows strength under pressure, saving 63.16% of breakpoints, more than Sagandikova's 50%. This resilience is vital for in-game predictions.
• Over the past year, Sagandikova has a better win rate at 48.89% compared to Savinykh's 12.5%, highlighting a clear edge in past performance.
• Sagandikova performs best on clay courts with a 52% win rate, whereas Savinykh finds success on hard surfaces at 59%.
• In the previous year, Sagandikova mainly competed in lower-tier tournaments with a win rate of 51.22%, while Savinykh has not won any matches in higher-tier events.
• Sagandikova faced lower-ranked opponents with an average ranking of 353.58, compared to Savinykh’s tougher competitors averaging a rank of 280.25.
• In matches stretching to a deciding set, Sagandikova has a 33% win rate, whereas Savinykh performs better with a 50% success rate.
• Break point opportunities are critical, with Savinykh converting 75% of their break chances compared to Sagandikova's 38%.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

Sagandikova has demonstrated pronounced strength in recent match outcomes and second serve efficiency, positioning them favorably over Savinykh. Their higher win percentage over the past year and aptitude on clay surfaces provide a solid foundation for victory, despite Savinykh’s formidable performance on hard surfaces and break point conversion.

Savinykh's ability to compete under pressure, as evidenced by their superior breakpoint saving rate, and a higher success rate in deciding sets, warrants consideration. However, their recent lack of success in higher-tier tournaments suggests potential vulnerability.

Given the current data, Sagandikova appears to have the overall edge in this match, with consistent performance over time likely tipping the scales in their favor.