Varvara Gracheva vs Harriet Dart Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance can offer invaluable insights into the upcoming match between Dart and Gracheva. In the last six months, Dart has achieved a 36.38% success rate on their second serve, whereas Gracheva has reached 40.84%. This difference in percentage underscores Gracheva's slight advantage in this crucial area.

Return game statistics also provide significant predictive value. In recent play, Dart has successfully won 52.21% of points on their opponent's second serve. On the other hand, Gracheva's comparable figure stands at 48.91%. Furthermore, for returns on first serves, Dart records 35.03% while Gracheva posts 34.16%. These figures edge toward Dart's favor in terms of winning return points.

Examining performance under pressure, Dart has saved 48.31% of breakpoints encountered recently, comparable to Gracheva's 48.53%. This near parity indicates that both players demonstrate resilience during high-stakes moments. When it comes to converting breakpoints, however, Dart holds a slight edge, having converted 42.96% of opportunities compared to Gracheva's 41.56%.

Overall performance in the past year reflects that Dart has won 44.9% of her matches (22 wins and 27 losses), whereas Gracheva has a better win percentage of 51.85% (28 wins and 26 losses). This difference provides Gracheva with a statistical upper hand in overall tour results.

Evaluating surface preferences, Dart's strongest performances are on indoor hard courts, boasting a 59% win rate. Conversely, Gracheva excels on clay, with a 66% win percentage. These preferences might influence their performance depending on the event surface.

When considering the quality of opponents faced over the last year, Dart has played against players with an average rank of 134.65, whereas Gracheva's opponents ranked slightly lower on average at 139.31, suggesting Dart has dealt with stiffer competition recently.

In terms of deciding set performance, Dart emerges as the stronger candidate by winning 59% of deciding sets in the past year, compared to Gracheva's 41%. This stat can be decisive if the match extends to a final set.

Lastly, recent participation levels in various tournament series indicate that Dart has primarily competed in the Masters series, possessing a win rate of 42.86%. In contrast, Gracheva has engaged mainly in the Main Tour, holding a 38.89% win rate. This could influence player readiness and adaptability in slightly different competitive environments.

Based on the evaluation of these statistics, the predictive indicators subtly favor Gracheva to emerge victorious, leveraging her recent success rate, more favorable second serve performance, and overall win percentage, although Dart's return prowess and deciding set advantage cannot be understated.