Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Victor Lilov vs Philip Sekulic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lilov vs Sekulic analysis and find out who is favored!
Victor Lilov vs Philip Sekulic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lilov has won 45.79% of points on his second serve, while Sekulic has won 50.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lilov, in recent form, has won 47.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sekulic has won 48.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.92% and 28.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lilov has saved 58.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sekulic has saved 60.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lilov has won 51.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 26), with Sekulic winning 54.17% (W/L 39/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lilov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 35/ 33). Sekulic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Lilov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.05% of matches (W/L 20/ 17), where as Sekulic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.78% of matches (W/L 20/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lilov has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.5 while Sekulic has played against players with an average rank of 251.03.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lilov has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sekulic has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lilov has converted 37.84% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sekulic has converted 44.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lilov 0 - 0 Sekulic
615
Rank
497
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
268
Rank
263
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
54% (76-66)
Career Total W/L
55% (85-69)
22% (2-7)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$92,390
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Victor Lilov | Philip Sekulic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 22% (2/7) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (6/16) | 47% (22/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (93/126) | 50% (227/231) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 50% (9/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0.34 |
| Aces Total | 25 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:27 | 1:55:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 226 | 310.05 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (426/731) | 62% (934/1498) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (284/426) | 68% (637/934) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (143/305) | 51% (286/564) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (18/51) | 42% (50/120) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (238/690) | 37% (524/1421) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 47% (9/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 22% (2/9) | 43% (9/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 33% (3/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 10% (10/1) |
Victor Lilov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Ajeet Rai
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
3
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
10
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Victor Lilov
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Victor Lilov
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
49 of
60)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Victor Lilov
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
72 of
136)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
54 of
136)
118
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Frusina
Player
Victor Lilov
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Victor Lilov
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
14 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Victor Lilov
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Sekulic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Mattia Bellucci
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
0-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Philip Sekulic
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
16
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Philip Sekulic
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Philip Sekulic
64%
(
74 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
44 of
118)
121
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(7) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Philip Sekulic
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lilov Vs Sekulic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
