Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva vs Talia Gibson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Sep at 05:20 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Jimenez Kasintseva vs T. Gibson

AND
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kasintseva 1 - 0 Gibson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva winning 2 and Talia Gibson winning 0. The last match between Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva and Talia Gibson was at the Suzhou WTA 125 - Suzhou, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva getting the victory 7-6(2) 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kasintseva | 1 |
| Gibson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Suzhou WTA 125 - Suzhou(10-01-25)
V. J. Kasintseva vs T. Gibson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $271,684 | Career Prize Money | $406,160 |
| 57.86% (173-126) | Career Total W/L | 63.12% (178-104) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 27.27% (3-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (2-6) |
V. J. Kasintseva vs T. Gibson Match Preview:
- How does each player's recent second serve performance compare? Talia Gibson holds a slight edge, winning 41.68% of second serve points to Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva's 41.06%.
- In return games, Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva has a small advantage, winning 49.55% of opponents' second serve points compared to Talia Gibson’s 48.71%.
- First serve returns favor Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva, securing 35.66% of points, whereas Talia Gibson wins at 32.70%.
- When under pressure, Talia Gibson excels somewhat, saving 50.57% of breakpoints, slightly better than Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva’s 48.42%.
- Considering overall performance over the last year, Talia Gibson has a higher match win rate of 64.94%, compared to Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva’s 56.06%.
- Talia Gibson's strengths on hard courts are notable, with a career win rate of 67%, while Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva excels on clay with the same win percentage.
- Both players have competed mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K in the past year, but Talia Gibson has a higher win rate of 70.69% compared to Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva's 54.55%.
- Who has faced tougher competition recently? Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva, with opponents averaging a rank of 216.23, compared to Talia Gibson's 286.49.
- In deciding sets, Talia Gibson shows stronger performance, winning 61% of them over the last year, while Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva wins 50%.
Editorial Prediction (September 30, 2025, UTC):
Recent statistics suggest that Talia Gibson has a slight upper hand in this matchup. Her ability to save breakpoints and convert match-winning opportunities gives her a competitive edge.
While Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva is slightly more effective in return games, especially on first serve returns, Gibson compensates with better overall match-winning consistency and superior performance under pressure.
Gibson's impressive record in deciding sets also bodes well if the match becomes tightly contested. Given these factors, Talia Gibson is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva vs Talia Gibson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. J. Kasintseva vs T. Gibson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 11 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:7:43 | Average Match Time | 2:7:43 |
| 66% (59/90) | 1st Serve % | 57% (46/80) |
| 64% (38/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (25/46) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (18/34) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 46% (37/80) | Return Points Win % | 40% (36/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
V. J. Kasintseva Recent Matches Played
T. Gibson Recent Matches Played

V. J. Kasintseva vs T. Gibson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.86% (173/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.12% (178/104) |
| 57.33% (391/291) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.52% (406/254) |
| 53.15% (3294/2904) | Games Win/Loss | 54.40% (3333/2794) |
| 58.33% (63/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.61% (145/76) |
| 60.87% (98/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 37.50% (9/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (18/12) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (12/12) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 347 | Aces Total | 919 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 1023 | Total Double Faults | 956 |
| 1:39:9 | Average Match Time | 1:37:18 |
| 340.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.82 |
| 64% (12596/19550) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12205/18973) |
| 60% (7610/12596) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (8037/12205) |
| 47% (3241/6954) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3220/6767) |
| 49% (1236/2500) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1067/2339) |
| 47% (9253/19779) | Return Points Win % | 45% (8671/19327) |
| 39.13% (9/14) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.00% (13/12) | Main Tour W/L | 38.89% (7/11) |
| 62.56% (142/85) | Challenger W/L | 63.72% (137/78) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Futures W/L | 85.71% (24/4) |
| 58% (172/295) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (176/280) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (32/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (45/74) |
| 48% (42/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (44/94) |
| 84% (183/154) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (180/154) |
| 16% (183/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (180/26) |
| 16% (116/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (102/24) |