Viktoria Hruncakova vs Lucrezia Stefanini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Second Serve Performance Recent Form: Over the past six months, Stefanini has exhibited a success rate of 43.46% on their second serve, while Hruncakova has achieved 48.05%. This stat holds a profound correlation with the accuracy of match predictions. Return Game Stats Recent Form: In recent form, Stefanini has demonstrated dominance in return stats, winning an impressive 61.55% of their opponent's second serve points, compared to Hruncakova's 52.93%. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Stefanini boasts a success rate of 42.74%, overshadowing Hruncakova's 34.34%. These figures strongly influence the determination of favorability in their head-to-head encounter. Under Pressure Analysis: Recent data reveals that Stefanini has showcased resilience by saving 53.7% of breakpoints, whereas Hruncakova has skillfully saved 56.77%. This particular statistic proves invaluable in predicting in-game betting outcomes. Performance Overview: In the past year, Stefanini has emerged victorious in 58.73% of matches played (W/L 37/26), while Hruncakova has secured triumph in 57.33% (W/L 43/32). These overall performance metrics provide an encompassing outlook on the head-to-head prediction. Best Surface: Stefanini's most favorable surface, based on career win percentages, is Hard, with a remarkable 63% success rate (W/L 106/61). On the contrary, their performance on Grass courts diminishes slightly, standing at 53% (W/L 10/9). As for Hruncakova, Hard courts also prove to be their stronghold, boasting a career win percentage of 64% (W/L 188/104). Conversely, Grass courts pose a challenge, with a win percentage of 49% (W/L 17/18). Player Level: Throughout the previous year, Stefanini has predominantly competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K, clinching victory in 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/15). Meanwhile, Hruncakova has engaged in a similar roster of Challenger/ITF tournaments, accumulating triumph in 62.12% of matches played (W/L 41/25). When evaluating these statistical comparisons to predict the favored player, it becomes evident that their performance is significantly influenced by the level of the event they partake in. Direct H2H Matches: To date, these players have confronted each other on a solitary occasion, resulting in Stefanini undergoing defeat and Hruncakova claiming victory. The encounter spanned across three sets, where Stefanini emerged triumphant in one, and Hruncakova secured two sets. Remarkably, their most recent clash occurred at the Zavarovalnica Sava Portoroz - Portoroz on September 13, 2021. The contest took place on a Hard court, concluding with Viktoria Hruncakova triumphing over Stefanini with a score of 6-4, 4-6, 7-6(5). Head to Head Match Duration: Throughout their previous tête-à-tête meetings, these players have averaged a match duration of 2 hours, 51 minutes, and 0 seconds. Deciding Set H2H Prediction: In one instance where a deciding set was necessary, Stefanini emerged victorious in none, while Hruncakova secured triumph on one occasion. This particular statistic serves as a pivotal predictor if the match extends to its full length. Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: They have encountered each other in one tiebreak situation, resulting in Stefanini failing to secure a victory, while Hruncakova triumphed once. Opponent Quality Stats: Over the course of the last 12 months, Stefanini has faced opponents with an average ranking of 229.44, while Hruncakova has encountered players with an average ranking of 269.35. Deciding Set Performance vs All Players: In the past year, when matches progressed to a deciding set, Stefanini showcased commendable prowess, securing victory in 59% of such instances. Hruncakova, on the other hand, obtained triumph in 58% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour. Current Event H2H Stats: While evaluating predictions based on past player performances holds significance, it is also crucial to examine current event statistics during an ongoing tournament. Such stats provide insights into the form and potential of players. For the latest updates on this aspect, kindly refer to the section below in HTML format. Break Point Conversion: Recent form indicates that Stefanini has successfully converted 50.15% of breakpoint opportunities, whereas Hruncakova has capitalized on 41.35% of their chances to disrupt their opponents' serves. This compelling statistic becomes instrumental in providing live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity. If you are interested in models that excel at predicting tennis matches, I recommend reading this noteworthy article (Warning: Reserved for those with an affinity for statistical analysis).