Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Vilius Gaubas vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaubas vs Tiffon analysis and find out who is favored!
Vilius Gaubas vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaubas has won 47.79% of points on his second serve, while Tiffon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaubas, in recent form, has won 54.03% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tiffon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaubas has saved 54.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tiffon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaubas has won 64.47% of matches played (W/L 49/ 27), with Tiffon winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaubas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 84/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4). Tiffon has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaubas has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.64% of matches (W/L 39/ 17), where as Tiffon has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaubas has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.51 while Tiffon has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaubas has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tiffon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaubas has converted 45.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tiffon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gaubas 0 - 0 Tiffon
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Vilius Gaubas | Pol MARTIN Tiffon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (39/27) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (335/293) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 71 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 308.21 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1218/1847) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (811/1218) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (302/629) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (94/214) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (837/1944) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 73% (11/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (18/28) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 70% (7/10) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 1st Match |
Vilius Gaubas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Jaime Faria
Player
Vilius Gaubas
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Vilius Gaubas
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Vilius Gaubas
80%
(
79 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Joao Sousa
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Nil Regas Luis
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Vilius Gaubas
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Vilius Gaubas
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Pol MARTIN Tiffon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Martin Krumich
35%
(
18 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
27 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
105)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
123)
111
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Lucas Bouquet
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Tristan Mccormick
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Michael Vrbensky
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaubas Vs Tiffon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
