Vitali Chvets vs Maceo Simpson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chvets vs Simpson analysis and find out who is favored!
Vitali Chvets vs Maceo Simpson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chvets has won 51.46% of points on his second serve, while Simpson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chvets, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Simpson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.4% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chvets has saved 65.52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Simpson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chvets has won 46.88% of matches played (W/L 15/ 17), with Simpson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chvets has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 42/ 47), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Simpson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 36% (W/L 16/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Chvets has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/ 17), where as Simpson has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chvets winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chvets winning 2 and Simpson winning 0. The last match between Chvets and Simpson was at the M15 Monastir, 26-12-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Vitali Chvets getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chvets and Simpson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chvets winning 0 times and Simpson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chvets winning 1, and Simpson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chvets has played against opponents with an average rank of 8.75 while Simpson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chvets has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Simpson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chvets has converted 52.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Simpson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chvets 1 - 0 Simpson
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
43
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
44% (68-87)
Career Total W/L
33% (17-35)
50% (2-2)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Vitali Chvets | Maceo Simpson |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-6(3) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Vitali Chvets | Maceo Simpson |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (60/57) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.02 | 0 |
DFs Total | 1 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 54% (42/78) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 55% (23/42) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (19/36) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (20/53) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Vitali Chvets Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Chirag Duhan
Player
Vitali Chvets
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-2 12-10 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 3-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Maceo Simpson Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Ali Habib
Player
Maceo Simpson
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ben Jones
Player
Maceo Simpson
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yujiro Onuma
Player
Maceo Simpson
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Joe Tyler
Player
Maceo Simpson
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more