Vitaliy Sachko vs Clement Tabur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Nov at 11:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur

UKR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Sachko 0 - 1 Tabur
They have played 3 sets in total, with Vitaliy Sachko winning 1 and Clement Tabur winning 2. The last match between Clement Tabur and Vitaliy Sachko was at the Moselle Open - Metz, 02-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Clement Tabur getting the victory 5-7 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sachko | 0 |
| Tabur | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Moselle Open - Metz(11-02-25)
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur H2H Profile
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur Match Preview:
- When evaluating recent second serve performance, Clement Tabur slightly outperforms Vitaliy Sachko with a win rate of 45.02% compared to Sachko's 43.61%. Does this give Tabur a small edge? Yes, it suggests a slight advantage.
- Analyzing return game statistics, Sachko wins 48.59% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Tabur scores 47.48%. Could Sachko's return ability be a game-changer? It might indeed play a crucial role.
- First serve return percentages slightly favor Tabur, who stands at 29.23% compared to Sachko’s 28.61%. Will this impact the outcome? It suggests a narrow advantage for Tabur.
- In pressure situations, Tabur excels by saving 56.07% of breakpoints, whereas Sachko saves 50.17%. Is Tabur more reliable under pressure? His stats indicate better breakpoint resilience.
- Evaluating overall performance, Tabur has secured a 66.67% win rate over the last year, outshining Sachko's 57.33%. How significant is this? It highlights Tabur's consistent edge.
- Best surface analysis shows Sachko and Tabur both excel on hard courts with win rates of 59%. Can the surface influence their performance? Hard courts suit both players equally well.
- Considering the level of play, Sachko has a higher success rate in Challengers/ITF tournaments (62.12%) compared to Tabur’s 56.76%. Is Sachko more competitive in lower-tier tournaments? This could indicate an edge at this level.
- Analyzing opponent quality, Sachko has faced tougher opposition, with an average ranking of 298.28 versus Tabur's 358.86. Does this reflect depth in Sachko’s game? It suggests greater experience against higher-ranked players.
- If a deciding set arises, Tabur has a slightly higher success rate (67%), marginally surpassing Sachko’s 66%. Who is better in clutch situations? Tabur appears marginally more reliable.
- For comprehensive forecasting, current event stats should be considered once matches begin, as they often reveal which player is in form.
Editorial Prediction (November 2, 2025, UTC):
Assessing the recent performance data, Clement Tabur demonstrates slight advantages in several statistical areas including breakpoint saving and first serve returns, which could prove pivotal in tight matches. His overall match win rate over the past year also underscores his superior consistency in competition.
Vitaliy Sachko, however, displays strength in return games and has faced higher-ranked opponents, reflecting his capability to challenge strong competitors, which might balance the dynamics.
Surface proficiency suggests that both players are equally capable on hard courts, indicating a level playing field in terms of surface preference.
While Sachko exhibits a marginally better record in deciding sets, the narrow difference suggests that both players can hold their nerve under pressure.
Given the comprehensive analysis, Clement Tabur emerges as the favorite to win this match, based on his consistency and slight statistical superiority in key performance areas.
Vitaliy Sachko vs Clement Tabur Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. Sachko vs C. Tabur H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 17 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:13:39 | Average Match Time | 2:13:39 |
| 63% (55/87) | 1st Serve % | 71% (65/92) |
| 64% (35/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (50/65) |
| 53% (17/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 33% (2/6) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 33% (30/92) | Return Points Win % | 40% (35/87) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
V. Sachko Recent Matches Played
C. Tabur Recent Matches Played

V. Sachko vs C. Tabur Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.55% (366/270) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.36% (303/199) |
| 55.68% (818/651) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.03% (665/481) |
| 53.01% (7276/6449) | Games Win/Loss | 53.19% (5745/5056) |
| 56.31% (58/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.15% (86/44) |
| 58.16% (221/159) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.03% (177/113) |
| 58.00% (87/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.38% (40/41) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1406 | Aces Total | 1165 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1406 | Total Double Faults | 1145 |
| 1:21:28 | Average Match Time | 1:36:31 |
| 414.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 445.41 |
| 63% (21771/34736) | 1st Serve % | 61% (18698/30703) |
| 67% (14530/21771) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (12579/18698) |
| 48% (6179/12965) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5954/12004) |
| 45% (1710/3768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1530/3441) |
| 42% (14850/35304) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13309/31347) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.18% (14/20) | Main Tour W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 55.63% (163/130) | Challenger W/L | 50.34% (74/73) |
| 63.05% (186/109) | Futures W/L | 65.29% (222/118) |
| 58% (359/616) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (299/496) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (79/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (76/135) |
| 57% (120/210) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (83/146) |
| 87% (338/295) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (283/255) |
| 13% (338/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (283/28) |
| 23% (298/70) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (219/48) |