Vivian Wolff vs Lexington Reed Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Oct at 12:43 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
V. Wolff vs L. Reed

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wolff 1 - 0 Reed
They have played 2 sets in total, with Vivian Wolff winning 2 and Lexington Reed winning 0. The last match between Vivian Wolff and Lexington Reed was at the W35 Bakersfield, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Vivian Wolff getting the victory 6-0 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wolff | 1 |
| Reed | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Bakersfield(10-14-25)
V. Wolff vs L. Reed H2H Profile
V. Wolff vs L. Reed Match Preview:
- Vivian Wolff's second serve success in recent months stands at 37.54%, whereas Lexington Reed has a slightly higher percentage of 42.86%. Is a stronger second serve indicative of match success? Typically, yes.
- In facing their opponent’s second serves, Wolff outshines Reed with a win percentage of 55.16% compared to Reed's 45.24%, suggesting Wolff's strength in return games.
- Wolff leads Reed in first serve return game performance, achieving 36.07% against Reed's 32.32%, an important stat for this head-to-head context.
- Under pressure, Wolff shows resilience by saving 43.48% of breakpoints, higher than Reed’s rate of 34.78%, highlighting Wolff's composure during critical moments.
- Over the last year, Wolff secured victories in 58.49% of matches, slightly edging out Reed’s 56.25% success rate, reflecting marginally superior performance overall.
- Surface preferences differ: Wolff excels on clay (57%), while Reed favors hard courts (57%). Could the match surface tip the scales in base competitiveness?
- Both players have predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF > $10K events. Wolff's win ratio is 60.78% as opposed to Reed's 56.25%, favoring Wolff's adaptability at this level.
- In terms of opponent difficulty, Wolff's opponents averaged a rank of 412.96 against Reed’s 422.88, suggesting slightly stronger competitive experience for Wolff.
- If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Wolff has a better record, winning 56% of such sets compared to Reed's 50%, potentially conferring a psychological advantage.
Editorial Prediction (October 15, 2025, UTC):
Recent performance indicators paint a detailed picture of both players' strengths and weaknesses. Vivian Wolff, with robust return games and breakpoint resilience, presents a disciplined player capable of turning the tables at crucial points in matches.
While both have shown solid results, Wolff's ability to outperform Reed in the first and second serve returns, alongside breakpoint saves, hints at a competitive edge. Their track record on clay versus Reed’s proficiency on hard courts might influence outcomes depending on the playing surface.
Considering Wolff's slightly higher win rate and stronger competitive encounters over the past year, they appear poised for success. Thus, Vivian Wolff is predicted to be the more likely winner in this approaching match.
Vivian Wolff vs Lexington Reed Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
V. Wolff vs L. Reed H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:26:8 | Average Match Time | 1:26:8 |
| 75% (45/60) | 1st Serve % | 66% (40/61) |
| 71% (32/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (23/40) |
| 47% (7/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 51% (31/61) | Return Points Win % | 35% (21/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
V. Wolff Recent Matches Played
L. Reed Recent Matches Played

V. Wolff vs L. Reed Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.83% (183/139) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (51/51) |
| 55.61% (416/332) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.15% (115/119) |
| 53.47% (3606/3138) | Games Win/Loss | 49.38% (1075/1102) |
| 56.06% (37/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.97% (34/29) |
| 57.49% (119/88) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.59% (17/22) |
| 55.10% (27/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 209 | Aces Total | 39 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1048 | Total Double Faults | 204 |
| 1:24:51 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 482.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 395.28 |
| 67% (11999/17939) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2015/3414) |
| 59% (7092/11999) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (1196/2015) |
| 43% (2525/5939) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (574/1399) |
| 50% (1243/2494) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (186/413) |
| 49% (8432/17244) | Return Points Win % | 45% (1533/3401) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.86% (116/88) | Challenger W/L | 42.86% (18/24) |
| 57.76% (67/49) | Futures W/L | 55.00% (33/27) |
| 57% (179/316) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (51/102) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (20/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 69% (11/16) |
| 51% (55/108) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (17/30) |
| 84% (188/157) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (53/46) |
| 16% (188/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (53/7) |
| 19% (134/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (49/5) |