Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Warren Sinius vs Dominik Langmajer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sinius vs Langmajer analysis and find out who is favored!
Warren Sinius vs Dominik Langmajer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sinius has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Langmajer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sinius, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Langmajer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sinius has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Langmajer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sinius has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Langmajer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sinius has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Langmajer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 22% (W/L 8/ 29), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sinius winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sinius winning 2 and Langmajer winning 0. The last match between Sinius and Langmajer was at the M15 Forbach, 26-09-2021, Q1 round, Carpet with Warren Sinius getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sinius and Langmajer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sinius winning 0 times and Langmajer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sinius winning 0, and Langmajer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sinius has played against opponents with an average rank of while Langmajer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sinius has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Langmajer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sinius has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Langmajer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sinius 1 - 0 Langmajer
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
42% (5-7)
Career Total W/L
20% (22-88)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Warren Sinius | Dominik Langmajer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 0 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:41:0 | 0:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 81% (25/31) | 61% (25/41) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (21/25) | 52% (13/25) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (3/6) | 6% (1/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 66% (27/41) | 23% (7/31) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Warren Sinius
Player
Dominik Langmajer
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Warren Sinius | Dominik Langmajer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Warren Sinius Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Warren Sinius
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Warren Sinius
Player
Dominik Langmajer
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Niklas Schell
Player
Warren Sinius
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
31 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
70
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Warren Sinius
Player
Pierre Antoine Tailleu
39%
(
29 of
74)
1st Serve %
37%
(
27 of
73)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
10
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Voljacques
Player
Warren Sinius
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Warren Sinius
Player
Nicolas Tepmahc
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 6-7(1) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Warren Sinius
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Warren Sinius
Player
Bradley Paliska
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
16 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
52
Total Points Won
44
|
1-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Warren Sinius
Player
Yannick Lenaerts
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dominik Langmajer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano D'Agostino
Player
Dominik Langmajer
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karlo Cubelic
Player
Dominik Langmajer
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
19 of
23)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominik Langmajer
Player
Julien Kaufmann
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Dominik Langmajer
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Leonardo Taddia
Player
Dominik Langmajer
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominik Langmajer
Player
Nathan Eugster
54%
(
42 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Dominik Langmajer
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
14
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sinius Vs Langmajer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
