Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Wilson Leite vs Timo Stodder Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Leite vs Stodder analysis and find out who is favored!
Wilson Leite vs Timo Stodder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leite has won 49.14% of points on his second serve, while Stodder has won 47.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leite, in recent form, has won 51.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stodder has won 52.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.1% and 30.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Leite has saved 55.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stodder has saved 54.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Leite has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 25/ 35), with Stodder winning 55.71% (W/L 39/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Leite has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 336/ 332), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8). Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Leite has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.48% of matches (W/L 17/ 25), where as Stodder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 20/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leite has played against opponents with an average rank of 336.75 while Stodder has played against players with an average rank of 240.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leite has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stodder has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Leite has converted 45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stodder has converted 45.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Leite 0 - 0 Stodder
575
Rank
341
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
329
Rank
257
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
49% (390-407)
Career Total W/L
65% (196-106)
36% (5-9)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$1,515
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Wilson Leite | Timo Stodder |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (5/9) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (13/17) | 36% (9/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (130/142) | 45% (109/135) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 34 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 19 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:42 | 1:38:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 238.64 | 81.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (543/904) | 62% (490/791) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (322/543) | 61% (300/490) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (178/361) | 46% (139/301) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (46/92) | 53% (31/59) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (382/869) | 39% (310/792) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 40% (4/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Wilson Leite Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
Player
Wilson Leite
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
109)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(7) 6-4 5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Franco Roncadelli
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
85%
(
55 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Marcelo Zormann
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Antonio Becerra Otarola
Player
Wilson Leite
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
91
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Wilson Leite
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Estaban Davila
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
Player
Wilson Leite
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wilson Leite
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Timo Stodder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-7(2) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Denis Petak
75%
(
67 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
14
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Marko Maksimovic
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Timo Stodder
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Steve Johnson
Player
Timo Stodder
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
49%
(
63 of
129)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Timo Stodder
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Timo Stodder
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Timo Stodder
43%
(
32 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Leite Vs Stodder Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
