Xing Dao Chen vs Ignasi Forcano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 09:52 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
X. Dao Chen vs I. Forcano

CHN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chen 1 - 0 Forcano
They have played 2 sets in total, with Xing Dao Chen winning 2 and Ignasi Forcano winning 0. The last match between Xing Dao Chen and Ignasi Forcano was at the M25 Huzhou, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Xing Dao Chen getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chen | 1 |
| Forcano | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Huzhou(10-22-25)
X. D. Chen vs I. Forcano H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.10% (69-54) | Career Total W/L | 56.52% (91-70) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
X. D. Chen vs I. Forcano Match Preview:
- Second serve performance is crucial. Ignasi Forcano has a slight edge, winning 42.32% of points, compared to Xing Dao Chen's 39.51%. Why might this be important? This stat often correlates with match outcomes.
- In return game stats, Ignasi Forcano again leads slightly, capturing 47.74% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Xing Dao Chen has 45.70%. What does this suggest? Better return game might indicate greater potential to break serve.
- On first serve returns, Xing Dao Chen is stronger, winning 27.74% compared to Forcano's 26.02%. Could this make a difference? First serve return effectiveness often favors players in tight sets.
- Under pressure, Forcano saves 52.80% of breakpoints, showing calm in tense situations, while Chen's rate is 47.42%.
- Overall, Forcano has a higher win percentage at 61.29% over the past year, in contrast to Xing Dao Chen’s 53.33% for match outcomes.
- Surface performance shows both have best performances on different surfaces: Forcano excels on Hard courts, and Chen on Indoor hard courts.
- Both players have primarily competed in similar tournament levels, but Forcano’s competition has been tougher, with opponents averaging a rank of 166.76 compared to Chen's 330.98.
- In deciding sets, Chen shows resilience, winning 54% compared to Forcano's 36%. Might this be a surprise twist? Deciding set prowess can be pivotal in close matches.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the statistics, Ignasi Forcano demonstrates a consistent edge in key areas such as second serve performance and return game strength. These factors often correlate strongly with match wins.
Though Xing Dao Chen has the advantage in first serve returns and a better deciding set record, Forcano’s superior performance under pressure and higher competitive win rate could outweigh these strengths.
Forcano also faced stronger opponents historically, indicating a more robust competitive experience. Based on these facts, Ignasi Forcano is the more likely victor in this upcoming matchup.
Xing Dao Chen vs Ignasi Forcano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
X. D. Chen vs I. Forcano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:23:33 | Average Match Time | 1:23:33 |
| 71% (50/70) | 1st Serve % | 73% (29/40) |
| 68% (34/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (13/29) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 14% (1/7) |
| 55% (22/40) | Return Points Win % | 37% (26/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
X. D. Chen Recent Matches Played
I. Forcano Recent Matches Played

X. D. Chen vs I. Forcano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.10% (69/54) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.52% (91/70) |
| 54.55% (150/125) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.16% (205/160) |
| 52.87% (1336/1191) | Games Win/Loss | 52.91% (1883/1676) |
| 57.14% (56/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.47% (69/49) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.28% (20/19) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 78 | Aces Total | 159 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 246 | Total Double Faults | 211 |
| 1:14:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 262.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 191.03 |
| 66% (3260/4924) | 1st Serve % | 62% (2783/4510) |
| 62% (2028/3260) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1835/2783) |
| 46% (763/1664) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (834/1727) |
| 43% (240/555) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (158/356) |
| 42% (2120/5068) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1613/4275) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.47% (69/49) | Futures W/L | 56.52% (91/70) |
| 55% (64/117) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (89/159) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 38% (9/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (13/29) |
| 52% (14/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (19/43) |
| 85% (68/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (96/81) |
| 15% (68/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (96/15) |
| 18% (55/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (65/10) |