Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yanaki Milev vs Cedric Stanke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Milev vs Stanke analysis and find out who is favored!
Yanaki Milev vs Cedric Stanke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Milev has won 46.87% of points on his second serve, while Stanke has won 46.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Milev, in recent form, has won 51.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stanke has won 51.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.77% and 33.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Milev has saved 54.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stanke has saved 67.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Milev has won 49.06% of matches played (W/L 26/ 27), with Stanke winning 52.83% (W/L 28/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Milev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 65/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Stanke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 29/ 46).
- Player level: In the last year, Milev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14), where as Stanke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.83% of matches (W/L 28/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Milev winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Milev winning 2 and Stanke winning 0. The last match between Milev and Stanke was at the M15 Antalya, 27-01-2022, Q2 round, Clay with Yanaki Milev getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Milev and Stanke have played a deciding set 0 times, with Milev winning 0 times and Stanke 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Milev winning 0, and Stanke 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Milev has played against opponents with an average rank of 195.87 while Stanke has played against players with an average rank of 29.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Milev has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stanke has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Milev has converted 49.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stanke has converted 38.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Milev 1 - 0 Stanke
526
Rank
482
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
58% (70-51)
Career Total W/L
46% (57-66)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
58% (7-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Cedric Stanke |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yanaki Milev | Cedric Stanke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 58% (7/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (29/23) | 53% (16/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (254/228) | 52% (162/150) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 73 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:23 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 179.43 | 64.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (845/1488) | 67% (308/462) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (585/845) | 69% (213/308) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (296/643) | 49% (76/154) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (83/166) | 37% (16/43) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (632/1450) | 40% (190/476) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (11/4) | 58% (7/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 58% (7/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Yanaki Milev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Yanaki Milev
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Fabrizio Andaloro
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Yanaki Milev
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Yanaki Milev
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Yanaki Milev
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Stefan Palosi
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
77%
(
54 of
70)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
75%
(
94 of
126)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
52 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Thomas Faurel
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
78%
(
71 of
91)
3
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Dinko Dinev
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
62
|
6-0 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Yanaki Milev
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
84%
(
51 of
61)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Cedric Stanke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
Cedric Stanke
79%
(
74 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 6-7(7) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(8) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Nour Fathalla
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Aryan Lakshmanan
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Andriy Poritskyy
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Milev Vs Stanke Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
