Yanki Erel vs Samir Hamza Reguig Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 07:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. Erel vs S. Hamza Reguig

TUR
0
Win
Played
0
Win

ALG
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Erel 0 - 0 Reguig
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Erel | 0 |
| Reguig | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
Y. Erel vs S. H. Reguig H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.34% (219-138) | Career Total W/L | 49.65% (143-145) |
| 9 | Titles | 1 |
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Y. Erel vs S. H. Reguig Match Preview:
- Yanki Erel has shown slightly better second serve performance recently, winning 45.04% of points compared to Samir Hamza Reguig's 41.49%. Is this enough to give Erel an edge? It appears so, considering the high correlation between this stat and winning matches.
- In returning opponent's second serves, Reguig outperforms Erel with 46.54% versus 42.81%. A crucial question arises: Can Reguig utilize this advantage? It certainly levels the playing field.
- Both players are fairly comparable in returning first serves, with Reguig again having a slight edge of 29.82% over Erel's 29.03%.
- Yanki Erel is stronger under pressure, saving 52.68% of breakpoints, compared to Samir Hamza Reguig's 46.80%. How might this affect their in-game performance? Erel's ability to stay composed in critical moments could be decisive.
- An overview of the last year shows Erel with a superior win rate of 73.13%, whereas Reguig recorded 43.55% victories. This statistic strongly suggests Erel is favored based on recent form.
- Surfaces matter: Erel excels on indoor hard courts but struggles on grass, while Reguig performs best on clay and is weakest on indoor hard courts. Which surface works best for Erel presently? Indoor hard seems to be Erel’s stronghold.
- Both players mainly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, but Erel's win percentage (73.21%) surpasses Reguig's (46.43%). This suggests a higher level of consistency for Erel at this level.
- Oppression quality plays a role—Erel has faced an average opponent rank of 386.96, while Reguig's has been tougher at 305.53. Does playing stronger opponents prepare Reguig better, or does Erel's success speak for itself?
- In deciding sets, Erel narrowly leads with a 61% win rate against Reguig's 60%. If this match goes the distance, expect a close battle, slightly tilted in Erel’s favor.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the comprehensive data, Yanki Erel appears to hold a modest advantage heading into this upcoming match. His superior performance in second serve efficiency and better handling of high-pressure situations provide him with a critical edge.
While Samir Hamza Reguig does show strengths in return game and has faced higher-ranked opponents, Erel's consistency and better recent match record suggest a stronger foundation for victory.
Given this analysis, Yanki Erel is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match, leveraging his strengths in serve performance and critical points pressure handling.
Yanki Erel vs Samir Hamza Reguig Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
Y. Erel Recent Matches Played
S. H. Reguig Recent Matches Played

Y. Erel vs S. H. Reguig Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.34% (219/138) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.65% (143/145) |
| 60.07% (486/323) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.55% (301/332) |
| 54.76% (4056/3351) | Games Win/Loss | 48.54% (2802/2970) |
| 67.39% (155/75) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.74% (97/102) |
| 43.18% (38/50) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.27% (46/42) |
| 68.42% (26/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 982 | Aces Total | 363 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 799 | Total Double Faults | 600 |
| 1:36:2 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 515.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 374.27 |
| 66% (14953/22779) | 1st Serve % | 66% (8767/13271) |
| 68% (10131/14953) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5261/8767) |
| 52% (4041/7826) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1928/4503) |
| 45% (1124/2498) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (647/1444) |
| 42% (9494/22743) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5531/13026) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (32/32) | Challenger W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 64.91% (185/100) | Futures W/L | 50.71% (142/138) |
| 62% (214/345) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (136/278) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 48% (43/90) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (27/58) |
| 51% (50/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 69% (43/62) |
| 85% (222/189) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (130/117) |
| 14% (222/31) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (130/13) |
| 22% (134/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (157/26) |