Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yannick Maden vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maden vs Zandschulp analysis and find out who is favored!
Yannick Maden vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maden has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zandschulp has won 50.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maden, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 49.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maden has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 61.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maden has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Zandschulp winning 43.75% (W/L 21/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 196/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Maden winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Maden winning 3 and Zandschulp winning 2. The last match between Maden and Zandschulp was at the Koblenz Challenger, 21-02-2020, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:1:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Maden and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Maden winning 0 times and Zandschulp 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Maden winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maden has played against opponents with an average rank of while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 167.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maden has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maden has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 34.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Maden 1 - 1 Zandschulp
784
Rank
96
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
61% (339-219)
Career Total W/L
63% (327-193)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
37% (7-12)
$381,245
Career Prize Money
$2,840,375
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Maden VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Yannick Maden | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 26 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:1:28 | 1:1:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (53/91) | 68% (61/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (35/53) | 77% (47/61) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (22/38) | 52% (15/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (28/90) | 37% (34/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Maden VS Zandschulp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Yannick Maden
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yannick Maden | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 37% (7/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (15/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (191/231) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.44 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 89 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 182.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (848/1344) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (573/848) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (234/496) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (39/114) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (486/1321) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
Yannick Maden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Yannick Maden
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Yannick Maden
40%
(
10 of
25)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Maden
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
76 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Yannick Maden
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Yannick Maden
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
13
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Yannick Maden
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Adrian Mannarino
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Maden Vs Zandschulp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
