Ze Zhang vs Nikola Ciric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zhang vs Ciric analysis and find out who is favored!
Ze Zhang vs Nikola Ciric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zhang has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ciric has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zhang, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ciric has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zhang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ciric has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zhang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ciric winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zhang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 35/ 15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 14/ 14). Ciric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 283/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zhang winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zhang winning 2 and Ciric winning 1. The last match between Zhang and Ciric was at the French Open - Paris, 22-05-2012, Q1 round, Clay with Ze Zhang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zhang and Ciric have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zhang winning 1 times and Ciric 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zhang winning 0, and Ciric 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zhang has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ciric has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zhang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ciric has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zhang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ciric has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zhang 1 - 0 Ciric
10
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
870
Rank
148
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
151
High
40
Age
L
Plays
15
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
15
Minor
Form
58% (371-266)
Career Total W/L
59% (298-209)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$208,945
Career Prize Money
$1,260
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Ze Zhang | Nikola Ciric |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 15 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 12 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (69/100) | 55% (57/104) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (49/69) | 70% (40/57) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 55% (26/47) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 25% (2/8) |
Return Points W% | 37% (38/104) | 36% (36/100) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5-7 6-4 6-4 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Nikola Ciric
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
1
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Ze Zhang | Nikola Ciric |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ze Zhang Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-0 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-5 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Ze Zhang
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Stefano Reitano
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Skander Mansouri
Player
Ze Zhang
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ze Zhang
Player
Rigele Te
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
6
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Dan Martin
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Lorenzo Ferri
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Nikola Ciric Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Nikola Ciric
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
32
|
7-6(1) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Nikola Ciric
Player
Pietro Rondoni
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Nikola Ciric
Player
Enrico Becuzzi
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
2 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Nikola Ciric
Player
Tudor Sulea
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Guillaume Rufin
Player
Nikola Ciric
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
25 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nikola Ciric
Player
Calin Manda
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 4-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H |
view more