Ziga Sesko vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 07:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Sesko vs B. Gusic Wan

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sesko 1 - 0 Wan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ziga Sesko winning 2 and Benjamin Gusic Wan winning 0. The last match between Ziga Sesko and Benjamin Gusic Wan was at the M15 Heraklion, 01-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ziga Sesko getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sesko | 1 |
| Wan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Heraklion(10-01-25)
Z. Sesko vs B. G. Wan H2H Profile
Z. Sesko vs B. G. Wan Match Preview:
- How do their recent second serve performances compare? Ziga Sesko has claimed 38.46% of second serve points, whereas Benjamin Gusic Wan has secured 42.32%, suggesting a slight advantage for Wan.
- Examining return game stats, Sesko has won 40.51% of opponent's second serve points; Wan has a better return rate at 43.94%. However, their first serve return stats are nearly identical, with Sesko achieving 27.52% and Wan 27.22%.
- In terms of saving breakpoints under pressure, Sesko has saved 47.37%, while Wan has a marginally better rate at 47.67%, indicating Wan might handle pressure slightly better.
- Looking at their past year's performance, Sesko has a win rate of 33.33% compared to Wan's 52.63%, showing Wan has been more successful overall.
- Surface preferences illustrate that both have won 17% of matches on their best surfaces, but Wan's best results are on Hard courts, whereas Sesko's are on Clay.
- Sesko has mainly competed at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, winning 33.33% of these matches. Wan has also played at this level with a better win rate of 52.63%, emphasizing Wan's consistent form.
- Analyzing competitor quality, Sesko faces opponents with an average rank of 474, while Wan competes against higher-ranked players with an average rank of 234.84.
- Regarding deciding sets, Wan has a decisive edge, winning 67% of them, whereas Sesko has yet to win any.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
As we anticipate the forthcoming match between Ziga Sesko and Benjamin Gusic Wan, several statistics illuminate potential outcomes. Wan exhibits a marginal advantage in second serve performance and return game efficiency, both critical indicators of match success.
Currently, Wan's ability to maintain composure under pressure is superior, particularly in breakpoints, reinforcing his competitive edge. Moreover, Wan's overall performance and experience against higher-ranked opponents highlight his readiness for greater challenges.
While Sesko displays potential, his struggle in deciding sets and less impressive win percentage signal obstacles against Wan. Considering these factors, Benjamin Gusic Wan is predicted to be the likely winner in this match-up.
Ziga Sesko vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Z. Sesko vs B. G. Wan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:23:19 | Average Match Time | 1:23:19 |
| 54% (29/54) | 1st Serve % | 56% (27/48) |
| 69% (20/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 56% (14/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 58% (28/48) | Return Points Win % | 37% (20/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Z. Sesko Recent Matches Played
B. G. Wan Recent Matches Played

Z. Sesko vs B. G. Wan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (7/7) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 50.00% (14/14) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.67% (32/43) |
| 51.02% (125/120) | Games Win/Loss | 48.67% (330/348) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.15% (13/14) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 38 | Aces Total | 41 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
| 1:14:31 | Average Match Time | 1:16:13 |
| 344.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 258.23 |
| 61% (420/692) | 1st Serve % | 54% (974/1807) |
| 63% (266/420) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (624/974) |
| 51% (140/272) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (397/833) |
| 42% (33/78) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (78/169) |
| 42% (271/652) | Return Points Win % | 39% (685/1736) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (7/7) | Futures W/L | 44.12% (15/19) |
| 50% (7/14) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 100% (7/7) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (13/12) |
| 0% (7/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (13/1) |
| 0% (7/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (22/3) |