Zizou Bergs vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bergs vs Findel-Hawkins analysis and find out who is favored!
Zizou Bergs vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bergs has won 51.68% of points on his second serve, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bergs, in recent form, has won 50.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.91% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bergs has saved 57.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bergs has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Findel-Hawkins winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bergs has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 13/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 102/ 66). Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Bergs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.5% of matches (W/L 29/ 11), where as Findel-Hawkins has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bergs winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bergs winning 2 and Findel-Hawkins winning 0. The last match between Bergs and Findel-Hawkins was at the M25 Sunderland, 11-04-2019, Second, I.hard with Zizou Bergs getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bergs and Findel-Hawkins have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bergs winning 0 times and Findel-Hawkins 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bergs winning 1, and Findel-Hawkins 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bergs has played against opponents with an average rank of 266.01 while Findel-Hawkins has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bergs has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bergs has converted 38.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bergs 1 - 0 Findel-Hawkins
11
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
114
Rank
112
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
62% (267-164)
Career Total W/L
59% (70-49)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$281,865
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bergs VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Zizou Bergs | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (40/58) | 77% (55/71) |
1st Serve Win% | 80% (32/40) | 71% (39/55) |
2nd Serve Win% | 78% (14/18) | 44% (7/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 100% (1/1) |
Return Points W% | 35% (25/71) | 21% (12/58) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Bergs VS Findel-Hawkins H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-3 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Zizou Bergs | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 56% (24/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (213/203) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.72 | 0 |
Aces Total | 145 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
DFs Total | 46 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:40 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 262.78 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (774/1269) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 74% (573/774) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (252/495) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 35% (44/125) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (481/1281) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Zizou Bergs Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Zizou Bergs
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Felipe Meligeni Alves
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Daniel Masur
Player
Zizou Bergs
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Henri Squire
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Stefano Travaglia
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joris De Loore
Player
Zizou Bergs
79%
(
88 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
81 of
127)
19
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
127)
120
Total Points Won
119
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrey Rublev
Player
Zizou Bergs
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
3
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Jurij Rodionov
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
13
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more