Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alan Fernando RUBIO Fierros vs Noah Thurner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fierros vs Thurner analysis and find out who is favored!
Alan Fernando RUBIO Fierros vs Noah Thurner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fierros 0 - 0 Thurner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fierros has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Thurner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fierros, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Thurner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fierros has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thurner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fierros has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Thurner winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fierros has played against opponents with an average rank of while Thurner has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fierros has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thurner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fierros has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thurner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fierros 0 - 0 Thurner
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Alan Fernando RUBIO Fierros Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Tauheed Browning
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
41%
(
34 of
82)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Isaiah Strode
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
73)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Noah Thurner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-6 6-1 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Noah Thurner
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noah Thurner
Player
Ante Petar Ercegovic
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noah Thurner
Player
Filip Krolo
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Fierros Vs Thurner Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
