Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bastian Trinker vs Issei Okamura Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trinker vs Okamura analysis and find out who is favored!
Bastian Trinker vs Issei Okamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trinker 1 - 0 Okamura
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trinker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Okamura has won 46.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trinker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Okamura has won 50.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trinker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Okamura has saved 57.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trinker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Okamura winning 39.02% (W/L 16/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trinker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 218/ 150), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11). Okamura has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Trinker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Trinker winning 2 and Okamura winning 0. The last match between Trinker and Okamura was at the China F11, 09-07-2016, Semifinals, Clay with Bastian Trinker getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trinker and Okamura have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trinker winning 0 times and Okamura 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trinker winning 0, and Okamura 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trinker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Okamura has played against players with an average rank of 26.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trinker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Okamura has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trinker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Okamura has converted 36.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
241
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
870
Rank
574
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
57% (281-214)
Career Total W/L
47% (211-234)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$8,325
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Bastian Trinker | Issei Okamura |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:0 | 1:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (32/48) | 60% (46/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (26/32) | 59% (27/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (11/16) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (36/77) | 23% (11/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Bastian Trinker
Player
Issei Okamura
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bastian Trinker | Issei Okamura |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (17/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (180/188) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 40.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (434/646) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (278/434) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (99/212) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (24/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (259/665) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 42% (8/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Bastian Trinker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 15-13 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Bastian Trinker
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bastian Trinker
Player
Or Ram-Harel
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matias Zukas
Player
Bastian Trinker
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bastian Trinker
Player
Conner Huertas Del Pino
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
5
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Petrone
Player
Bastian Trinker
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Bastian Trinker
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
82%
(
56 of
68)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
6 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Issei Okamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Issei Okamura
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dharmil Shah
Player
Issei Okamura
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jesse Delaney
Player
Issei Okamura
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Trinker Vs Okamura Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
