Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Beibit Zhukayev vs Edoardo Lavagno Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zhukayev vs Lavagno analysis and find out who is favored!
Beibit Zhukayev vs Edoardo Lavagno Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zhukayev 0 - 1 Lavagno
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zhukayev has won 49.19% of points on his second serve, while Lavagno has won 48.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zhukayev, in recent form, has won 47.16% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lavagno has won 52.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.37% and 36.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zhukayev has saved 63.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lavagno has saved 58.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zhukayev has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 40/ 28), with Lavagno winning 49.15% (W/L 29/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zhukayev has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 95/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 31/ 41). Lavagno has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 228/ 128), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 6/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Zhukayev has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.78% of matches (W/L 31/ 20), where as Lavagno has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.19% of matches (W/L 19/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zhukayev winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zhukayev winning 0 and Lavagno winning 2. The last match between Zhukayev and Lavagno was at the M15 Shymkent, 05-06-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Edoardo Lavagno getting the victory 7-6(7) 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zhukayev and Lavagno have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zhukayev winning 0 times and Lavagno 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Zhukayev winning 0, and Lavagno 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zhukayev has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.76 while Lavagno has played against players with an average rank of 305.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zhukayev has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lavagno has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zhukayev has converted 44.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lavagno has converted 46.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zhukayev 0 - 1 Lavagno
174
Rank
174
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
267
Rank
223
High
25
Age
L
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
53% (154-139)
Career Total W/L
63% (234-135)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$115,375
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Beibit Zhukayev | Edoardo Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (50/84) | 63% (49/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (42/50) | 76% (37/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (14/34) | 69% (20/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 27% (21/78) | 33% (28/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Beibit Zhukayev | Edoardo Lavagno |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (29/26) | 52% (25/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (290/289) | 52% (225/211) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 52% (11/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.85 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 238 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 89 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:58 | 1:44:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 305.92 | 262.86 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1142/1884) | 65% (950/1457) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (844/1142) | 62% (592/950) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (365/742) | 48% (243/507) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (51/114) | 48% (77/162) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (655/1832) | 43% (613/1423) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 86% (6/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (10/16) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 11% (9/1) |
Beibit Zhukayev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Patrick Kypson
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
9
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(3) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
8
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Rigele Te
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Egor Gerasimov
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
12
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Antoine Bellier
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
80 of
129)
8
Aces
24
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
71%
(
29 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
26 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
43 of
129)
125
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(3) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Edoardo Lavagno Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Marvin Moeller
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Philip Hjorth
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Lucas Catarina
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Cedric Stanke
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve %
77%
(
17 of
22)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
20
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Zhukayev Vs Lavagno Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
