Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Benjamin Hassan vs Peter Fajta Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hassan vs Fajta analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Hassan vs Peter Fajta Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hassan has won 51.39% of points on his second serve, while Fajta has won 45.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hassan, in recent form, has won 51.91% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fajta has won 54.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.88% and 29.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hassan has saved 61.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fajta has saved 55.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hassan has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 52/ 36), with Fajta winning 68.29% (W/L 28/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hassan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 176/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Fajta has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 49/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 64/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Hassan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 40/ 25), where as Fajta has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 28/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hassan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hassan winning 2 and Fajta winning 0. The last match between Hassan and Fajta was at the Banja Luka Challenger, 22-08-2022, Q3, Clay with Benjamin Hassan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:49:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hassan and Fajta have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hassan winning 0 times and Fajta 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hassan winning 0, and Fajta 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hassan has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.08 while Fajta has played against players with an average rank of 161.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hassan has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fajta has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hassan has converted 41.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fajta has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hassan 1 - 0 Fajta
159
Rank
149
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
655
Rank
477
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
60% (280-183)
Career Total W/L
63% (119-71)
46% (13-15)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$133,940
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Benjamin Hassan | Peter Fajta |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:49:29 | 0:49:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (22/36) | 55% (22/40) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (17/22) | 59% (13/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 79% (11/14) | 28% (5/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (22/40) | 22% (8/36) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Peter Fajta
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Benjamin Hassan | Peter Fajta |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (13/15) | 45% (5/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (32/34) | 48% (13/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (325/317) | 47% (126/140) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 127 | 40 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 60 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:37 | 1:41:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 244.57 | 148.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1109/1909) | 64% (518/807) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (781/1109) | 63% (327/518) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (426/800) | 45% (131/289) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (63/157) | 44% (28/63) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (711/1908) | 39% (285/736) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (13/28) | 45% (5/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 29% (7/2) |
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Benjamin Hassan
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
58 of
76)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
26 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
41 of
118)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
55 of
116)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
67%
(
28 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
116)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Benjamin Hassan
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
10
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Benjamin Hassan
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Fajta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
George Lazarov
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
76%
(
35 of
46)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Peter Fajta
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
Koki Matsuda
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Peter Fajta
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dali Blanch
Player
Peter Fajta
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
108)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
Andres Fernandez Canovas
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Peter Fajta
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
15
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
Tilen Kovac
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandr Ovcharenko
Player
Peter Fajta
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hassan Vs Fajta Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Peter Fajta
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
