Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Hubert Hurkacz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Hurkacz analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Hubert Hurkacz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.28% of points on his second serve, while Hurkacz has won 55.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 48.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hurkacz has won 46.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.08% and 27.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 61.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hurkacz has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 47.17% of matches played (W/L 25/ 28), with Hurkacz winning 68.83% (W/L 53/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Hurkacz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 180/ 86), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 62/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Hurkacz has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 19/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 3 and Hurkacz winning 2. The last match between Zandschulp and Hurkacz was at the French Open - Paris, 30-05-2021, First, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Hurkacz have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Hurkacz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Hurkacz 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.34 while Hurkacz has played against players with an average rank of 128.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hurkacz has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 36.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hurkacz has converted 38.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Hurkacz
112
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
9
Rank
8
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
63% (331-195)
Career Total W/L
63% (376-222)
44% (11-14)
YTD W/L
70% (23-10)
$2,900,825
Career Prize Money
$8,935,765
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Hurkacz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 30 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:41:0 | 3:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (97/163) | 65% (100/154) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (71/97) | 70% (70/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (42/66) | 52% (28/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (56/154) | 31% (50/163) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Zandschulp VS Hurkacz H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
60%
(
97 of
163)
1st Serve %
65%
(
100 of
154)
5
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
70 of
100)
64%
(
42 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
50 of
163)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
56 of
154)
169
Total Points Won
148
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (11/14) | 70% (23/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (24/32) | 65% (58/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (267/293) | 54% (505/429) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 65% (11/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 80% (8/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.92 |
| Aces Total | 114 | 418 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.1 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 47 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:46 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.72 | 146.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1134/1792) | 64% (1763/2740) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (779/1134) | 79% (1389/1763) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (320/658) | 57% (553/977) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (56/150) | 38% (70/184) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (653/1753) | 34% (991/2905) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/1) |
| Masters W/L | 56% (5/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 71% (12/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (11/23) | 68% (19/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 57% (17/30) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 53% (8/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 80% (25/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 20% (25/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 38% (8/3) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hubert Hurkacz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
10
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
10 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Daniel Altmaier
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
15
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
15
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Cristian Garin
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jan Choinski
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Hurkacz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Hubert Hurkacz
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
