Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Martin Beran Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Beran analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Martin Beran Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 47.66% of points on his second serve, while Beran has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 48.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beran has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 59.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beran has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 44% of matches played (W/L 22/ 28), with Beran winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Beran has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 61/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 14/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Beran has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Beran winning 0. The last match between Zandschulp and Beran was at the Netherlands F6 (Rotterdam), 23-08-2017, Second, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Beran have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zandschulp winning 0 times and Beran 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Beran 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 165.34 while Beran has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beran has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 35.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beran has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Beran
7
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
115
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
706
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
63% (328-195)
Career Total W/L
52% (121-110)
36% (8-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,870,600
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Beran H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Martin Beran |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:3:0 | 1:3:0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (28/41) | 67% (37/55) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 54% (20/37) |
2nd Serve Win% | 69% (9/13) | 28% (5/18) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 50% (1/2) |
Return Points W% | 55% (30/55) | 27% (11/41) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Beran H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Martin Beran
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Martin Beran |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 36% (8/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 37% (18/31) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (223/267) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
Aces Total | 104 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
DFs Total | 67 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:44 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 169.5 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (970/1543) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (664/970) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (270/573) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (45/126) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (561/1528) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (8/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Casper Ruud
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Federico Coria
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Rinky Hijikata
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Martin Beran Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Martin Beran
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
25
|
5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Beran
Player
Michail Pervolarakis
54%
(
55 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
9
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Dayne Kelly
Player
Martin Beran
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
45
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Beran
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
100%
(
27 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Beran
Player
Brydan Klein
65%
(
77 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
80 of
130)
7
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
80)
69%
(
29 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
39 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
46 of
130)
126
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 7-6(1) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 7-5 10-7 | H2H | |||
QF |
Will Maher
Player
Martin Beran
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
5
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Beran
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Beran
Player
Jake Delaney
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Millen Hurrion
Player
Martin Beran
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more