Brandon Lam vs Berk Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lam vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Lam vs Berk Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lam has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 44.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lam, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 55.62%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lam has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 52.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lam has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ilkel winning 50% (W/L 21/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lam has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 21/ 26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 63/ 79).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lam winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lam winning 2 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Lam and Ilkel was at the M15 Monastir, 27-06-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Brandon Lam getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lam and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lam winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lam winning 1, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lam has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 72.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lam has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lam has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 47.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lam 1 - 0 Ilkel
Brandon Lam
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
Berk Ilkel
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
41% (9-13)
Career Total W/L
44% (84-105)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Brandon Lam | Berk Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 19 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 7-6(3) 10-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Brandon Lam | Berk Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (26/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (215/173) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/7) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 0 | 10 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 0 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 70.38 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (505/754) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (304/505) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (113/249) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 49% (42/86) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (333/749) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Brandon Lam Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Axel Nefve
Player
Brandon Lam
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Sam Riffice
Player
Brandon Lam
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Lam
Player
Alessandro-Damiano Ventre
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 5-3 ret. | H2H |
view more
Berk Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Louroi Martinez
Player
Berk Ilkel
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hong-Lin Fu
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dinko Dinev
Player
Berk Ilkel
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Hien Pham
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
5-7 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Drazen Petrovic
Player
Berk Ilkel
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
45 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Berk Ilkel
Player
Farzan Amiri
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more