Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Damien Wenger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wong vs Wenger analysis and find out who is favored!
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Damien Wenger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 1 Wenger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 49.38% of points on his second serve, while Wenger has won 51.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 48.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wenger has won 55.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.81% and 38.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 60.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wenger has saved 53.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 66.25% of matches played (W/L 53/ 27), with Wenger winning 62.5% (W/L 45/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 80/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Wenger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 242/ 124), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Wong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.95% of matches (W/L 30/ 8), where as Wenger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.31% of matches (W/L 32/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wong winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wong winning 0 and Wenger winning 2. The last match between Wong and Wenger was at the M15 Antalya, 12-04-2022, First, Clay with Damien Wenger getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wong and Wenger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wong winning 0 times and Wenger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wong winning 0, and Wenger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 234.03 while Wenger has played against players with an average rank of 260.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 66% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wenger has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 33.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wenger has converted 47.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wong 0 - 1 Wenger
180
Rank
180
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
381
Rank
363
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (101-76)
Career Total W/L
64% (253-141)
45% (10-12)
YTD W/L
59% (16-11)
$23,250
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 4 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:0 | 1:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (28/47) | 47% (27/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 29% (8/28) | 67% (18/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (8/19) | 50% (15/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 88% (7/8) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (24/57) | 66% (31/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Damien Wenger
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (10/12) | 59% (16/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (25/27) | 58% (34/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (258/267) | 54% (296/255) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 59% (16/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 153 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 84 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:50 | 1:52:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 351.77 | 311.7 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (943/1691) | 61% (1079/1756) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (688/943) | 63% (682/1079) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (362/748) | 51% (345/677) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (51/156) | 49% (103/209) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (649/1732) | 45% (801/1786) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (10/22) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 23% (13/3) |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Moez Echargui
49%
(
54 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Blake Ellis
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Alexander Blockx
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Damien Wenger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Damien Wenger
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Damien Wenger
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
79%
(
55 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Rocco Piatti
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
72%
(
26 of
36)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Damien Wenger
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Niccolo Ciavarella
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
80%
(
48 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
31 of
40)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Anton Matusevich
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Wong Vs Wenger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
