Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Federico Iannaccone Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wong vs Iannaccone analysis and find out who is favored!
Chak Lam Coleman Wong vs Federico Iannaccone Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Wong 1 - 0 Iannaccone
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wong has won 49.89% of points on his second serve, while Iannaccone has won 49.34%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wong, in recent form, has won 47.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Iannaccone has won 55.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.94% and 38.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wong has saved 62.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Iannaccone has saved 55.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wong has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 49/ 28), with Iannaccone winning 56% (W/L 42/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 80/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Iannaccone has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 51/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16), where as Iannaccone has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 30/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Wong winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Wong winning 2 and Iannaccone winning 0. The last match between Wong and Iannaccone was at the M15 Torello, 03-11-2021, First, Hard with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wong and Iannaccone have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wong winning 0 times and Iannaccone 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wong winning 0, and Iannaccone 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wong has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.06 while Iannaccone has played against players with an average rank of 281.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wong has won 66% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Iannaccone has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wong has converted 32.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Iannaccone has converted 51.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
181
Rank
180
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
483
Rank
474
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
57% (101-77)
Career Total W/L
53% (164-145)
43% (10-13)
YTD W/L
55% (18-15)
$23,250
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wong VS Iannaccone H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Federico Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (34/57) | 58% (42/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (26/34) | 50% (21/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (12/23) | 55% (17/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (35/73) | 33% (19/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Wong VS Iannaccone H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Federico Iannaccone
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Federico Iannaccone |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (10/13) | 55% (18/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (25/29) | 54% (42/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (265/280) | 53% (377/328) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (10/10) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 159 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:58 | 2:3:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 359.65 | 287.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (978/1762) | 70% (1614/2292) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (710/978) | 61% (979/1614) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (378/784) | 49% (334/677) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (52/160) | 51% (141/275) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (667/1792) | 45% (1040/2315) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) | 29% (2/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (16/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (10/23) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 25% (2/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 35% (17/6) |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Moez Echargui
49%
(
54 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Blake Ellis
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Alexander Blockx
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Iannaccone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Federico Iannaccone
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Federico Iannaccone
76%
(
91 of
120)
1st Serve %
82%
(
77 of
94)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Federico Iannaccone
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Federico Iannaccone
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Daniele Minighini
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
72%
(
21 of
29)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
44%
(
12 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
17 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
40
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Federico Iannaccone
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Luca Potenza
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Gabriele Piraino
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Jesse Delaney
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Wong Vs Iannaccone Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
