Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Charles Broom vs Kai Wehnelt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Broom vs Wehnelt analysis and find out who is favored!
Charles Broom vs Kai Wehnelt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Broom has won 52.95% of points on his second serve, while Wehnelt has won 47.12%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Broom, in recent form, has won 54.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wehnelt has won 51.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.26% and 30% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Broom has saved 63.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wehnelt has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Broom has won 57.69% of matches played (W/L 45/ 33), with Wehnelt winning 53.45% (W/L 31/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Wehnelt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 82/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 6/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 27/ 15), where as Wehnelt has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 24/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Broom winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Broom winning 2 and Wehnelt winning 0. The last match between Broom and Wehnelt was at the M15 Heraklion, 03-12-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Charles Broom getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Broom and Wehnelt have played a deciding set 0 times, with Broom winning 0 times and Wehnelt 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Broom winning 0, and Wehnelt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Broom has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.99 while Wehnelt has played against players with an average rank of 126.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Broom has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wehnelt has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Broom has converted 37.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wehnelt has converted 35.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Broom 1 - 0 Wehnelt
339
Rank
322
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
602
Rank
513
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
63% (201-117)
Career Total W/L
55% (197-158)
59% (16-11)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Charles Broom | Kai Wehnelt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (42/61) | 64% (37/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (32/42) | 62% (23/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 38% (8/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (27/58) | 31% (19/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Kai Wehnelt
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Charles Broom | Kai Wehnelt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (16/11) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (37/30) | 38% (5/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (330/315) | 48% (56/61) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 177 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:50 | 1:22:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 150.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1296/2025) | 61% (197/325) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (907/1296) | 70% (138/197) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (382/729) | 44% (56/128) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (80/225) | 36% (16/45) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (879/2186) | 42% (152/363) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (11/5) | 33% (2/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (16/27) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 79% (14/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 21% (14/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (13/5) | 0% (4/0) |
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Finn Bass
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
George Houghton
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Masamichi Imamura
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kai Wehnelt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Manas Manoj Dhamne
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Tsihon Fedorov
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Kai Wehnelt
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Kai Wehnelt
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Kai Wehnelt
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
35 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(3) 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Kai Wehnelt
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Shogo Sanada
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Kai Wehnelt
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicaise Muamba
Player
Kai Wehnelt
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
11
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
8
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Broom Vs Wehnelt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Charles Broom
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Kai Wehnelt
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
