Constantin Schmitz vs MAIKEL Borg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmitz vs Borg analysis and find out who is favored!
Constantin Schmitz vs MAIKEL Borg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmitz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Borg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmitz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Borg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmitz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Borg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmitz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Borg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmitz has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12). Borg has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmitz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Borg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmitz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Borg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmitz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Borg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmitz 0 - 0 Borg
Constantin Schmitz
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
MAIKEL Borg
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Constantin Schmitz | MAIKEL Borg |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Constantin Schmitz Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mick Veldheer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Luke Johnson
Player
Constantin Schmitz
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Zachary Eisinga
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Peter Heller
Player
Constantin Schmitz
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Dayne Kelly
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Jannik Rother
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Constantin Schmitz
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ivan Sergeyev
Player
Constantin Schmitz
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
79 of
113)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
MAIKEL Borg Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Maikel Borg
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-7(4) 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-0 ret. | H2H |
view more