Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Cox vs Maikel De Boes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cox vs Boes analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cox vs Maikel De Boes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cox has won 48.84% of points on his second serve, while Boes has won 41.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cox, in recent form, has won 53.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Boes has won 54.05%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.21% and 38.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cox has saved 47.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boes has saved 35.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cox has won 57.41% of matches played (W/L 31/ 23), with Boes winning 66.67% (W/L 4/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cox has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 235/ 117), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 26/ 30). Boes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 14/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Cox has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/ 12), where as Boes has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cox winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cox winning 2 and Boes winning 0. The last match between Cox and Boes was at the M15 Doha, 20-10-2021, First, Hard with Daniel Cox getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cox and Boes have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cox winning 0 times and Boes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cox winning 0, and Boes 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cox has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.61 while Boes has played against players with an average rank of 110.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cox has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boes has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cox has converted 38.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boes has converted 54.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cox 1 - 0 Boes
564
Rank
206
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
61% (436-284)
Career Total W/L
41% (20-29)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$37,845
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Cox | Maikel De Boes |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (29/47) | 65% (30/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 93% (27/29) | 57% (17/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (7/18) | 38% (6/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (23/46) | 28% (13/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Cox
Player
Maikel De Boes
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Cox | Maikel De Boes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (24/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (187/149) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 81.17 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (673/1019) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (488/673) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (169/346) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (51/134) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (455/1087) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Cox Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Leonardo Rossi
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Hynek Barton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maikel De Boes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Maikel De Boes
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maikel De Boes
Player
Nyo Van Dyck
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 0-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(10) 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alexander Wolfschmidt
Player
Maikel De Boes
49%
(
36 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
Maikel De Boes
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cox Vs Boes Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
