Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs Maxime Mora Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Mora analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Maxime Mora Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 0 Mora
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.38% of points on his second serve, while Mora has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 51.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mora has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.09% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 58.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mora has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Mora winning 41.38% (W/L 12/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 181/ 95), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Mora has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 131/ 120), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 12/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.67% of matches (W/L 15/ 21), where as Mora has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 12/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michalski winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Michalski winning 2 and Mora winning 0. The last match between Michalski and Mora was at the M15 Antalya, 03-11-2022, Second, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Mora have played a deciding set 0 times, with Michalski winning 0 times and Mora 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Mora 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 245.13 while Mora has played against players with an average rank of 179.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mora has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 46.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mora has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 1 - 0 Mora
334
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
845
Rank
628
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
62% (214-131)
Career Total W/L
51% (172-167)
50% (14-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Maxime Mora |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:0 | 1:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (32/70) | 66% (38/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (20/32) | 55% (21/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (24/38) | 50% (10/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (27/58) | 37% (26/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Maxime Mora
46%
(
32 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Maxime Mora |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (14/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (31/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (294/307) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:40 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 308.96 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1242/2028) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (780/1242) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (396/786) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (84/182) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (799/1951) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (14/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (13/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Mora Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Maxime Mora
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Dahlin
Player
Maxime Mora
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Maxime Mora
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Maxime Mora
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Maxime Mora
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
87)
4
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Maxime Mora
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Mora
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
41 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Mora
Player
Giovanni Calvano
61%
(
68 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
34%
(
15 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
52%
(
58 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
47 of
84)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Mora
Player
Valentin Lapalu
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Karlsson Wistrand
Player
Maxime Mora
47%
(
37 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Mora Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
