Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Paty vs Corentin Denolly Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paty vs Denolly analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Paty vs Corentin Denolly Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Paty 1 - 0 Denolly
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paty has won 56.85% of points on his second serve, while Denolly has won 47.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paty, in recent form, has won 46.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Denolly has won 53.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.41% and 41.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paty has saved 46.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Denolly has saved 54.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paty has won 58.7% of matches played (W/L 27/ 19), with Denolly winning 67.11% (W/L 51/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 96/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11). Denolly has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 256/ 131), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 52/ 42).
- Player level: In the last year, Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.7% of matches (W/L 27/ 19), where as Denolly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.25% of matches (W/L 43/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paty winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paty winning 2 and Denolly winning 1. The last match between Paty and Denolly was at the M15 Frankfurt am Main, 10-08-2022, First, Clay with Daniel Paty getting the victory 6-3 1-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paty and Denolly have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paty winning 1 times and Denolly 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paty winning 0, and Denolly 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paty has played against opponents with an average rank of 133.43 while Denolly has played against players with an average rank of 198.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paty has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Denolly has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paty has converted 44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Denolly has converted 49.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
704
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
359
Rank
289
High
26
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
54% (110-95)
Career Total W/L
63% (371-220)
67% (6-3)
YTD W/L
69% (24-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$45,000
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Paty | Corentin Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (46/78) | 71% (66/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (29/46) | 70% (46/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (18/32) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (37/93) | 40% (31/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Paty
Player
Corentin Denolly
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
7
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
84
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Paty | Corentin Denolly |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (6/3) | 69% (24/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 66% (50/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (96/78) | 54% (373/317) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 69% (24/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.66 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 57 | 76 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 133 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:20 | 1:36:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 264.49 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (286/483) | 65% (1431/2213) |
| 1st Serve W% | 78% (223/286) | 65% (924/1431) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (112/197) | 46% (363/782) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (22/50) | 48% (134/278) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (225/564) | 46% (1053/2310) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/5) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 73% (16/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (6/9) | 71% (24/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 100% (7/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 100% (21/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 0% (21/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 21% (14/3) |
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Daniel Paty
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Matthias Ujvary
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
59 of
79)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Aljaz Jeran
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Mariano Tammaro
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Justin Engel
Player
Daniel Paty
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Samuel Puskar
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Tobias Smoliner
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
81%
(
44 of
54)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Daniel Paty
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Corentin Denolly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Lucas Bouquet
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Duarte Vale
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Patrick Maloney
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Arvid Nordquist
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Meecah Bigun
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Jaycer Lyeons
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Axel Nefve
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paty Vs Denolly Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
