Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniil Glinka vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Glinka vs Wong analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniil Glinka vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glinka has won 53.16% of points on his second serve, while Wong has won 49.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glinka, in recent form, has won 51.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wong has won 48.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.81% and 30.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Glinka has saved 70.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wong has saved 62.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Glinka has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 48/ 30), with Wong winning 65.85% (W/L 54/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Glinka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 48/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 26/ 29). Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 80/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Glinka has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.52% of matches (W/L 40/ 22), where as Wong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.61% of matches (W/L 31/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Glinka winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Glinka winning 2 and Wong winning 1. The last match between Glinka and Wong was at the M15 Monastir, 06-08-2021, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniil Glinka getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Glinka and Wong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Glinka winning 1 times and Wong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Glinka winning 0, and Wong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glinka has played against opponents with an average rank of 153.94 while Wong has played against players with an average rank of 226.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glinka has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wong has won 66% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Glinka has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wong has converted 34.47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Glinka 1 - 0 Wong
442
Rank
442
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
180
Rank
180
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
52% (157-145)
Career Total W/L
57% (101-75)
53% (17-15)
YTD W/L
48% (10-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$23,250
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:0 | 2:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (51/88) | 59% (54/92) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (40/51) | 78% (42/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (22/37) | 45% (17/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (33/92) | 30% (26/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniil Glinka
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
92)
14
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (17/15) | 48% (10/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (43/32) | 50% (25/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (392/342) | 50% (254/255) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 50% (10/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.51 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 181 | 150 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 75 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:23 | 1:52:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 165.75 | 343.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1411/2250) | 55% (914/1648) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1052/1411) | 73% (671/914) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (445/839) | 49% (357/734) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (81/222) | 34% (51/152) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (903/2400) | 38% (632/1676) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 50% (9/9) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (17/32) | 48% (10/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 18% (2/11) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (23/16) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (23/7) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 18% (11/2) |
Daniil Glinka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Daniil Glinka
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
81 of
107)
17
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Egor Pleshivtsev
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Daniil Glinka
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Andres Delgadillo
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Daniil Glinka
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Daniil Glinka
53%
(
67 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
119)
16
Aces
9
11
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
37 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
32 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Daniil Glinka
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
2 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Daniil Glinka
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
5
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
32 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Aidan Mchugh
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
James Kent Trotter
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Moez Echargui
49%
(
54 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Blake Ellis
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Alexander Blockx
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Glinka Vs Wong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
