Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniil Glinka vs Liam Hignett Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Glinka vs Hignett analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniil Glinka vs Liam Hignett Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Glinka 1 - 0 Hignett
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glinka has won 53.24% of points on his second serve, while Hignett has won 52.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glinka, in recent form, has won 51.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hignett has won 36.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.73% and 27.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Glinka has saved 70.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hignett has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Glinka has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 48/ 28), with Hignett winning 18.18% (W/L 2/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Glinka has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 48/ 39), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 26/ 29). Hignett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Glinka has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 40/ 20), where as Hignett has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 18.18% of matches (W/L 2/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Glinka winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Glinka winning 2 and Hignett winning 0. The last match between Glinka and Hignett was at the M25 Nottingham, 18-04-2022, Q3, Hard with Daniil Glinka getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Glinka and Hignett have played a deciding set 0 times, with Glinka winning 0 times and Hignett 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Glinka winning 0, and Hignett 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glinka has played against opponents with an average rank of 156.62 while Hignett has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glinka has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hignett has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Glinka has converted 38.21% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hignett has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Glinka 1 - 0 Hignett
442
Rank
442
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
52% (160-145)
Career Total W/L
29% (13-32)
57% (20-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Liam Hignett |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (29/40) | 63% (38/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 58% (22/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 82% (9/11) | 27% (6/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (32/60) | 23% (9/40) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniil Glinka
Player
Liam Hignett
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniil Glinka | Liam Hignett |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (20/15) | 0% (0/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (49/33) | 14% (1/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (433/363) | 40% (30/45) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (15/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.51 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 198 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:19 | 1:22:20 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 158.66 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1540/2434) | 60% (107/177) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (1146/1540) | 64% (69/107) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (476/894) | 53% (37/70) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (94/246) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (993/2593) | 31% (51/167) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (17/9) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (20/35) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (3/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 72% (25/18) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 28% (25/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Daniil Glinka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Robin Bertrand
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
74
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Orel Kimhi
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Daniil Glinka
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
81 of
107)
17
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
51 of
81)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
107)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Egor Pleshivtsev
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Daniil Glinka
81%
(
63 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Andres Delgadillo
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Daniil Glinka
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Daniil Glinka
53%
(
67 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
119)
16
Aces
9
11
Double Faults
3
88%
(
59 of
67)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
62 of
81)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
37 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
32 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fery
Player
Daniil Glinka
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Hignett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tiran Sanghera
Player
Liam Hignett
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Davis
Player
Liam Hignett
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Houghton
Player
Liam Hignett
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Quayle
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 3-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Damian Rodriguez
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Van Der Kooij
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 7-6(5) 10-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Quayle
Player
Liam Hignett
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ronald Hohmann
Player
Liam Hignett
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(5) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Liam Hignett
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Ali Habib
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Glinka Vs Hignett Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniil Glinka
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
