Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Pichler vs John Lamble Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pichler vs Lamble analysis and find out who is favored!
David Pichler vs John Lamble Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pichler has won 50.69% of points on his second serve, while Lamble has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pichler, in recent form, has won 55.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamble has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.08% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pichler has saved 57.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamble has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pichler has won 45.31% of matches played (W/L 29/ 35), with Lamble winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Lamble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 135/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 20/ 20), where as Lamble has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pichler winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pichler winning 2 and Lamble winning 0. The last match between Pichler and Lamble was at the Israel F16, 28-11-2016, First, Hard with David Pichler getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pichler and Lamble have played a deciding set 0 times, with Pichler winning 0 times and Lamble 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pichler winning 0, and Lamble 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.84 while Lamble has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pichler has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamble has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pichler has converted 44.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamble has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pichler 1 - 0 Lamble
561
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
781
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
56% (342-267)
Career Total W/L
58% (146-105)
43% (9-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Pichler | John Lamble |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (28/42) | 61% (28/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (24/28) | 54% (15/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (7/14) | 28% (5/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (26/46) | 26% (11/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
David Pichler
Player
John Lamble
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Pichler | John Lamble |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (25/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (221/213) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.3 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 260.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (871/1388) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (592/871) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (258/517) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (58/130) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (559/1402) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
David Pichler
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
16
Total Points Won
20
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
John Lamble Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
John Lamble
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Krainik
Player
John Lamble
47%
(
40 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Lamble
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
John Lamble
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
John Lamble
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Pichler Vs Lamble Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
