Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Poljak vs George Loffhagen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poljak vs Loffhagen analysis and find out who is favored!
David Poljak vs George Loffhagen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poljak has won 49.27% of points on his second serve, while Loffhagen has won 58.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poljak, in recent form, has won 50.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loffhagen has won 48.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.22% and 32.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poljak has saved 58.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loffhagen has saved 47.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poljak has won 39.53% of matches played (W/L 17/ 26), with Loffhagen winning 62.07% (W/L 18/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 108). Loffhagen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 32/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20), where as Loffhagen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Poljak winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Poljak winning 2 and Loffhagen winning 0. The last match between Poljak and Loffhagen was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 01-04-2021, Second, Hard with David Poljak getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:41:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Poljak and Loffhagen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Poljak winning 0 times and Loffhagen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Poljak winning 0, and Loffhagen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poljak has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.74 while Loffhagen has played against players with an average rank of 216.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poljak has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loffhagen has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poljak has converted 33.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loffhagen has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Poljak 1 - 0 Loffhagen
897
Rank
370
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
440
Rank
333
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
54% (306-258)
Career Total W/L
61% (137-86)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Poljak | George Loffhagen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 7 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:41:0 | 0:41:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (13/28) | 52% (12/23) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (11/13) | 42% (5/12) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 36% (4/11) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 61% (14/23) | 32% (9/28) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 1-0 ret. |
Stats 
David Poljak
Player
George Loffhagen
46%
(
13 of
28)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33
Total Points Won
18
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Poljak | George Loffhagen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (19/25) | 69% (9/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (228/225) | 55% (68/56) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 125 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:56 | 1:49:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 159.53 | 60.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (907/1482) | 63% (240/379) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (655/907) | 73% (176/240) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (286/575) | 58% (81/139) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (45/132) | 43% (16/37) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (536/1451) | 40% (167/418) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (7/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (1/0) |
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Strombachs
Player
David Poljak
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
54 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
George Loffhagen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Rigele Te
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
George Loffhagen
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
9 of
9)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
44%
(
12 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
25
|
3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Michael Shaw
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
George Loffhagen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Johannes Seeman
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
49 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
117
|
4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Patrick Brady
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
view more
Poljak Vs Loffhagen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
