Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Poljak vs Hamad Medjedovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Poljak vs Medjedovic analysis and find out who is favored!
David Poljak vs Hamad Medjedovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Poljak has won 48.93% of points on his second serve, while Medjedovic has won 50.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Poljak, in recent form, has won 50.81% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medjedovic has won 51.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.22% and 30.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Poljak has saved 59.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medjedovic has saved 55.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Poljak has won 39.53% of matches played (W/L 17/ 26), with Medjedovic winning 66.67% (W/L 36/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Poljak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 103/ 72), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 104/ 108). Medjedovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Poljak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 39.39% of matches (W/L 13/ 20), where as Medjedovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 14/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Poljak winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Poljak winning 2 and Medjedovic winning 1. The last match between Poljak and Medjedovic was at the M25 Nur-Sultan, 24-02-2022, Second, I.hard with David Poljak getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Poljak and Medjedovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Poljak winning 1 times and Medjedovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Poljak winning 1, and Medjedovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Poljak has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.74 while Medjedovic has played against players with an average rank of 232.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Poljak has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medjedovic has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Poljak has converted 34.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medjedovic has converted 44.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Poljak 1 - 0 Medjedovic
894
Rank
370
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
121
Rank
102
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
54% (306-258)
Career Total W/L
62% (112-68)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
58% (7-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$331,355
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Poljak VS Medjedovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | David Poljak | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:27:0 | 2:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (52/94) | 50% (53/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (42/52) | 79% (42/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (24/42) | 52% (27/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (36/105) | 30% (28/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Poljak VS Medjedovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
David Poljak
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
11
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Poljak | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 58% (7/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (19/25) | 55% (16/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (228/225) | 53% (143/127) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 75% (6/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.57 | 0.73 |
| Aces Total | 125 | 96 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:56 | 1:34:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 159.53 | 225.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (907/1482) | 64% (523/818) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (655/907) | 72% (378/523) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (286/575) | 52% (154/295) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (45/132) | 44% (36/82) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (536/1451) | 40% (331/835) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 58% (7/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 50% (6/3) |
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Strombachs
Player
David Poljak
64%
(
75 of
118)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
4
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
54 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
112
Total Points Won
113
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
James Watt
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Nikita Ianin
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikita Ianin
Player
David Poljak
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Joe Tyler
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Knaff
Player
David Poljak
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
David Poljak
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
50 of
86)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Jeff Wolf
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Laurent Lokoli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
20
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
29 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Francisco Comesana
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Hugo Gaston
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
44%
(
39 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Poljak Vs Medjedovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Hamad Medjedovic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
