Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dennis Novak vs Tim Van Rijthoven Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Novak vs Rijthoven analysis and find out who is favored!
Dennis Novak vs Tim Van Rijthoven Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Novak has won 49.8% of points on his second serve, while Rijthoven has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Novak, in recent form, has won 51.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rijthoven has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.35% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Novak has saved 58.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rijthoven has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Novak has won 54.41% of matches played (W/L 37/ 31), with Rijthoven winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Novak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 115/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 77/ 63). Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Novak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 30/ 26), where as Rijthoven has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Novak winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Novak winning 1 and Rijthoven winning 2. The last match between Novak and Rijthoven was at the Biel Challenger, 22-09-2021, Second, I.hard with Tim Van Rijthoven getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Novak and Rijthoven have played a deciding set 1 times, with Novak winning 0 times and Rijthoven 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Novak winning 1, and Rijthoven 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Novak has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.69 while Rijthoven has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Novak has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rijthoven has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Novak has converted 40.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rijthoven has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Novak 0 - 1 Rijthoven
192
Rank
85
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
871
Rank
101
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
63% (486-291)
Career Total W/L
62% (234-141)
48% (11-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$797,895
Career Prize Money
$499,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dennis Novak | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:42 | 2:14:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (59/108) | 68% (74/109) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (47/59) | 73% (54/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (26/49) | 69% (24/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (31/109) | 32% (35/108) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(1) |
Stats 
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Dennis Novak
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
108)
14
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
31 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dennis Novak | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (11/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (26/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (240/230) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 67 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 55 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:41 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 384.09 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (952/1442) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (651/952) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (244/490) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (63/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (590/1490) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (11/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Dennis Novak
46%
(
41 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Dennis Novak
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Gauthier Onclin
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Lukas Neumayer
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Dennis Novak
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Dennis Novak
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
78%
(
69 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Novak Vs Rijthoven Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
