Eduardo Struvay vs Jesper DE Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Struvay vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Eduardo Struvay vs Jesper DE Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Struvay has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jong has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Struvay, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Struvay has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Struvay has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jong winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Struvay has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 155/ 96), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Jong has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Struvay has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jong has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Struvay has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Struvay has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Struvay 0 - 0 Jong
Eduardo Struvay
14
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
33
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
Jesper DE Jong
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Eduardo Struvay | Jesper DE Jong |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Eduardo Struvay Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Eduardo Struvay
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eduardo Struvay
Player
Julius Tverijonas
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Eduardo Struvay
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
9 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Eduardo Struvay
50%
(
15 of
30)
1st Serve %
69%
(
18 of
26)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Eduardo Struvay
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
1
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eduardo Struvay
Player
Adrian Bodmer
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lucas Poullain
Player
Eduardo Struvay
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Jesper DE Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Petr Nouza
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Jesper De Jong
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Marcello Serafini
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jesper De Jong
Player
Gauthier Onclin
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more