Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elmar Ejupovic vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ejupovic vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!
Elmar Ejupovic vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ejupovic has won 50.1% of points on his second serve, while Decamps has won 49.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ejupovic, in recent form, has won 48.92% of his opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 55.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.97% and 35.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ejupovic has saved 67.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 53.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ejupovic has won 40% of matches played (W/L 18/ 27), with Decamps winning 63.64% (W/L 35/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ejupovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 172/ 137), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Ejupovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 19), where as Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.77% of matches (W/L 30/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ejupovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ejupovic winning 2 and Decamps winning 0. The last match between Ejupovic and Decamps was at the San Luis Potosi Challenger, 10-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Elmar Ejupovic getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ejupovic and Decamps have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ejupovic winning 0 times and Decamps 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Ejupovic winning 1, and Decamps 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ejupovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.69 while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 202.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ejupovic has won 22% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Decamps has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ejupovic has converted 36.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 44.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ejupovic 1 - 0 Decamps
551
Rank
273
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
630
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
57% (355-268)
Career Total W/L
63% (162-94)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
68% (19-9)
$5,215
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Elmar Ejupovic | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:40 | 1:55:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (38/65) | 52% (47/91) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (26/38) | 64% (30/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (14/27) | 48% (21/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (40/91) | 38% (25/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Gabriel Decamps
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elmar Ejupovic | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 68% (19/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (20/22) | 67% (41/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (207/213) | 57% (321/245) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 74% (14/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 30% (3/7) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.6 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 122 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 93 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:4 | 1:30:24 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 314.21 | 185.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (820/1319) | 62% (978/1573) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (602/820) | 68% (665/978) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (250/499) | 49% (293/595) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (34/92) | 46% (94/205) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (432/1285) | 44% (755/1707) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/3) | 71% (17/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 69% (18/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/4) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 100% (16/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 0% (16/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Elmar Ejupovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Andres Delgadillo
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
9
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Diego Bustamante
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve %
51%
(
19 of
37)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
72 of
126)
11
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
10
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Ryan Seggerman
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
37 of
43)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
9 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
20 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Trey Hilderbrand
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
12
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
30 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Gabriel Decamps
52%
(
53 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Victor Hugo Remondy Pagotto
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Gabriel Decamps
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Bancalari
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Cigarran
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
63 of
116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Ejupovic Vs Decamps Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
