Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eric James Johnson vs John Lamble Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Johnson vs Lamble analysis and find out who is favored!
Eric James Johnson vs John Lamble Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Johnson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lamble has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Johnson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamble has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Johnson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamble has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Johnson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lamble winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Johnson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 59/ 45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Lamble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 135/ 89), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Johnson winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Johnson winning 2 and Lamble winning 3. The last match between Johnson and Lamble was at the Israel F17, 30-11-2015, Second, Hard with John Lamble getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:41:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Johnson and Lamble have played a deciding set 1 times, with Johnson winning 1 times and Lamble 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Johnson winning 0, and Lamble 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Johnson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lamble has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Johnson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamble has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Johnson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamble has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Johnson 1 - 1 Lamble
Ret.
Rank
510
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
781
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
56% (64-51)
Career Total W/L
58% (146-105)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Eric James Johnson | John Lamble |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 19 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:30 | 1:41:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (81/141) | 59% (77/130) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (53/81) | 70% (54/77) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (26/60) | 51% (27/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 38% (8/21) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (49/130) | 44% (62/141) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
John Lamble
Player
Eric James Johnson
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 2-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
John Lamble
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eric James Johnson | John Lamble |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Eric James Johnson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Eric James Johnson
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Tursunov
Player
Eric James Johnson
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
74
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Jenson Brooksby
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
87%
(
55 of
63)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Dischinger
Player
Eric James Johnson
52%
(
60 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
63 of
111)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hunter Callahan
Player
Eric James Johnson
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Eric James Johnson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Evan Zhu
53%
(
62 of
118)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
0
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
48%
(
27 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
8 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric James Johnson
Player
Gabriel Friedrich
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manuel Sanchez
Player
Eric James Johnson
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
5
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
John Lamble Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
John Lamble
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Krainik
Player
John Lamble
47%
(
40 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
John Lamble
Player
Alejandro Hoyos
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
John Lamble
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
John Lamble
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Johnson Vs Lamble Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
