Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Bagnis vs Francisco Comesana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bagnis vs Comesana analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Bagnis vs Francisco Comesana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bagnis has won 51.92% of points on his second serve, while Comesana has won 51.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bagnis, in recent form, has won 49.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Comesana has won 48.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.6% and 33.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bagnis has saved 65.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Comesana has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bagnis has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Comesana winning 69.05% (W/L 58/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bagnis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 595/ 367), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Comesana has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 231/ 117), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bagnis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Comesana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.63% of matches (W/L 50/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bagnis winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bagnis winning 2 and Comesana winning 0. The last match between Bagnis and Comesana was at the Montevideo Challenger, 11-11-2021, Second, Clay with Facundo Bagnis getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bagnis and Comesana have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bagnis winning 0 times and Comesana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bagnis winning 0, and Comesana 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bagnis has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.12 while Comesana has played against players with an average rank of 299.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bagnis has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Comesana has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bagnis has converted 41.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Comesana has converted 37.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bagnis 1 - 0 Comesana
119
Rank
55
High
34
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
91
Rank
91
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
59% (634-437)
Career Total W/L
65% (243-131)
70% (26-11)
YTD W/L
59% (17-12)
$1,274,440
Career Prize Money
$100,195
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Francisco Comesana |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:22 | 1:54:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (50/75) | 66% (52/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (34/50) | 62% (32/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (11/25) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (37/79) | 40% (30/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Francisco Comesana
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Bagnis | Francisco Comesana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (26/11) | 59% (17/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (54/30) | 56% (39/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (439/392) | 52% (350/324) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 74% (25/9) | 62% (16/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 139 | 142 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 86 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:57 | 1:55:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.14 | 272.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1748/2740) | 63% (1315/2072) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1187/1748) | 72% (942/1315) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (518/992) | 51% (388/757) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (113/274) | 37% (86/231) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1098/2717) | 40% (880/2222) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 40% (4/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 82% (14/3) | 73% (11/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (26/36) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (9/15) | 42% (5/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 58% (7/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 21% (14/3) |
Facundo Bagnis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(8) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Facundo Bagnis
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
9 of
9)
1st Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
92%
(
12 of
13)
24
Total Points Won
2
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
31 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Gregoire Barrere
55%
(
59 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
63%
(
31 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Clement Chidekh
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrey Rublev
Player
Facundo Bagnis
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Francisco Comesana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Francisco Comesana
39%
(
26 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(5) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Filip Misolic
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
41 of
87)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Joris De Loore
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
72 of
109)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
51 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Francisco Comesana
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Andrea Vavassori
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Ugo Blanchet
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Jaime Faria
75%
(
62 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
113)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
22 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Bagnis Vs Comesana Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
