Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Mena vs Mikael Torpegaard Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mena vs Torpegaard analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Mena vs Mikael Torpegaard Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 51.45% of points on his second serve, while Torpegaard has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 55.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Torpegaard has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.1% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 60.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Torpegaard has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 68.35% of matches played (W/L 54/ 25), with Torpegaard winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Torpegaard has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 53/ 30), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.74% of matches (W/L 33/ 10), where as Torpegaard has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mena winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mena winning 2 and Torpegaard winning 0. The last match between Mena and Torpegaard was at the Tallahassee Challenger, 23-04-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Facundo Mena getting the victory 6-1 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Torpegaard have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mena winning 0 times and Torpegaard 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 1, and Torpegaard 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.29 while Torpegaard has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Torpegaard has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 51.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Torpegaard has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mena 1 - 0 Torpegaard
340
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
166
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (466-354)
Career Total W/L
58% (152-112)
67% (24-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$140,110
Career Prize Money
$89,705
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mena VS Torpegaard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Facundo Mena | Mikael Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:55 | 1:21:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (41/59) | 64% (41/64) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (28/41) | 61% (25/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 39% (9/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (30/64) | 36% (21/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mena VS Torpegaard H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Facundo Mena
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Mena | Mikael Torpegaard |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (24/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (51/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (407/294) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (21/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 144 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 67 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 333.78 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1147/2099) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (823/1147) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (486/952) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (138/249) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1005/2218) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (24/36) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (22/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (22/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Karue Sell
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Kaichi Uchida
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Leonardo Aboian
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Facundo Mena
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
37%
(
25 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Thomas Brown
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mikael Torpegaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
3-6 6-0 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Kaichi Uchida
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Sock
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
51%
(
54 of
106)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
50%
(
26 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Gomez
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
57%
(
72 of
127)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
3
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
23 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
47%
(
60 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
107
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Andrew Harris
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Max Jacob Schnur
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
99)
4
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
9
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Harrison
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mena Vs Torpegaard Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
