Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Iannaccone vs Kristjan Tamm Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Iannaccone vs Tamm analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Iannaccone vs Kristjan Tamm Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Iannaccone has won 49.77% of points on his second serve, while Tamm has won 45.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Iannaccone, in recent form, has won 54.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tamm has won 47.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.46% and 31.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Iannaccone has saved 56.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tamm has saved 66.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Iannaccone has won 58.44% of matches played (W/L 45/ 32), with Tamm winning 45.83% (W/L 11/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Iannaccone has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 51/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Tamm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 94/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 11/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Iannaccone has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 33/ 18), where as Tamm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Iannaccone winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Iannaccone winning 2 and Tamm winning 1. The last match between Iannaccone and Tamm was at the M25 Padova, 10-08-2022, First, Clay with Federico Iannaccone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Iannaccone and Tamm have played a deciding set 1 times, with Iannaccone winning 1 times and Tamm 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Iannaccone winning 0, and Tamm 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Iannaccone has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.7 while Tamm has played against players with an average rank of 157.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Iannaccone has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tamm has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Iannaccone has converted 52.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tamm has converted 39.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Iannaccone 1 - 0 Tamm
474
Rank
474
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
827
Rank
625
High
25
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
53% (164-143)
Career Total W/L
51% (164-155)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Iannaccone VS Tamm H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Federico Iannaccone | Kristjan Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:0 | 2:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (61/76) | 62% (44/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (41/61) | 64% (28/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 26% (7/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (36/71) | 36% (27/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Iannaccone VS Tamm H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Kristjan Tamm
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Iannaccone | Kristjan Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 47% (8/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (41/32) | 48% (19/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (353/299) | 49% (187/193) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 47% (8/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 28 | 99 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 70 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:37 | 1:50:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 292.94 | 194.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1488/2132) | 62% (790/1267) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (904/1488) | 70% (550/790) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (320/643) | 45% (216/477) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (134/253) | 39% (42/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (957/2116) | 37% (448/1198) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (16/9) | 47% (8/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 50% (8/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (16/6) | 11% (9/1) |
Federico Iannaccone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriel Debru
Player
Federico Iannaccone
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Federico Iannaccone
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Daniele Minighini
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
72%
(
21 of
29)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
44%
(
12 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
47%
(
17 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
40
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Federico Iannaccone
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Luca Potenza
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Gabriele Piraino
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Jesse Delaney
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Federico Iannaccone
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(5) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nikola Milojevic
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kristjan Tamm Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Corban Crowther
Player
Kristjan Tamm
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Kristjan Tamm
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Corban Crowther
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Egor Agafonov
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Kristjan Tamm
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Filip Peliwo
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
29%
(
10 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
39 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Ye Hongyu
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tauheed Browning
Player
Kristjan Tamm
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mees Rottgering
Player
Kristjan Tamm
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve %
64%
(
9 of
14)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Illya Beloborodko
58%
(
64 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Iannaccone Vs Tamm Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
