Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Felix Gill vs Jakub Mensik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gill vs Mensik analysis and find out who is favored!
Felix Gill vs Jakub Mensik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gill has won 52.18% of points on his second serve, while Mensik has won 52.26%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gill, in recent form, has won 52.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mensik has won 50.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.6% and 26.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gill has saved 61.21% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mensik has saved 70.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gill has won 67.5% of matches played (W/L 54/ 26), with Mensik winning 64.71% (W/L 44/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 110/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 45/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 37/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Gill has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 14), where as Mensik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 24/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gill winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gill winning 2 and Mensik winning 1. The last match between Gill and Mensik was at the M25 Pardubice, 23-09-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Felix Gill getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gill and Mensik have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gill winning 1 times and Mensik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gill winning 0, and Mensik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gill has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.34 while Mensik has played against players with an average rank of 220.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gill has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mensik has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gill has converted 43.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mensik has converted 42.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gill 1 - 0 Mensik
320
Rank
318
High
21
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
65
Rank
65
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
62% (137-84)
Career Total W/L
65% (95-52)
66% (19-10)
YTD W/L
69% (20-9)
$25,500
Career Prize Money
$645,030
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Felix Gill | Jakub Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:0 | 2:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (40/78) | 49% (44/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (27/40) | 70% (31/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (20/38) | 39% (18/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (41/90) | 40% (31/78) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Felix Gill
Player
Jakub Mensik
51%
(
40 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Felix Gill | Jakub Mensik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (19/10) | 69% (20/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (44/25) | 65% (44/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (346/297) | 52% (351/319) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 71% (17/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.75 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 246 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 77 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:41 | 1:44:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 276.38 | 174.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1298/2080) | 59% (1300/2194) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (872/1298) | 74% (959/1300) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (412/782) | 53% (470/894) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (98/222) | 43% (61/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (839/2036) | 35% (713/2024) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 66% (19/10) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 66% (19/29) | 70% (19/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 67% (10/15) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (21/18) | 90% (21/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (21/3) | 10% (21/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 13% (8/1) |
Felix Gill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Mathias Bourgue
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Jan Hrazdil
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Felix Gill
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Robert Strombachs
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Josip Simundza
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Felix Gill
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Sousa
Player
Felix Gill
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
79 of
113)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
52 of
79)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Steven Diez
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve %
56%
(
15 of
27)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
5 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
35
Total Points Won
18
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Calvin Hemery
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jakub Mensik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Jakub Mensik
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
11 of
12)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
28
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Grigor Dimitrov
59%
(
74 of
126)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
16
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lukas Klein
Player
Jakub Mensik
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Jakub Mensik
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
8
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(7) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Borna Coric
61%
(
66 of
109)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
18
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Gill Vs Mensik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Felix Gill
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
