Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Frederico Ferreira Silva vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Silva vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Frederico Ferreira Silva vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Silva 0 - 0 Carabelli
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Silva has won 51% of points on their second serve, while Carabelli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Silva, in recent form, has won 52.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.24% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Silva has saved 57.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Silva has won 38.1% of matches played (W/L 16/ 26), with Carabelli winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Silva has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 217/ 113), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 30/ 28). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Silva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 30.77% of matches (W/L 8/ 18), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Silva has played against opponents with an average rank of 282.17 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Silva has won 18% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Silva has converted 41.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Frederico Ferreira Silva | Camilo UGO Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (18/20) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (190/179) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 29 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 296.75 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (736/1185) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (462/736) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (229/449) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (64/155) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (528/1216) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 1st Match |
Frederico Ferreira Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Luca Potenza
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Jules Marie
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
August Holmgren
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
88 of
122)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
53 of
88)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Pol Amoros Ramos
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Eric Sanchez
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
48%
(
16 of
33)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
50
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Silva Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
