Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gianluca Mager vs Ji Sung Nam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mager vs Nam analysis and find out who is favored!
Gianluca Mager vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mager 1 - 0 Nam
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mager has won 50.21% of points on his second serve, while Nam has won 47.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mager, in recent form, has won 51.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 51.97%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.23% and 35.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mager has saved 56.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 58.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mager has won 60% of matches played (W/L 24/ 16), with Nam winning 48.28% (W/L 14/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mager has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 307/ 212), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 34/ 42). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 232/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Mager has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 23/ 14), where as Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 13/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mager winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mager winning 2 and Nam winning 0. The last match between Mager and Nam was at the Davis Cup, World Group, QR, ITA-KOR 4-0, 06-03-2020, Rubber 2, Clay with Gianluca Mager getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:34:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mager and Nam have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mager winning 0 times and Nam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mager winning 0, and Nam 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mager has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.75 while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 321.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mager has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mager has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 36.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mager 1 - 0 Nam
266
Rank
62
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
714
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
56% (378-302)
Career Total W/L
57% (279-214)
66% (21-11)
YTD W/L
50% (5-5)
$668,315
Career Prize Money
$1,445
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gianluca Mager | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:0 | 1:34:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (35/62) | 68% (56/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (28/35) | 64% (36/56) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (13/27) | 42% (11/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 24% (4/17) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (35/82) | 34% (21/62) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Gianluca Mager
Player
Ji Sung Nam
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gianluca Mager | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (21/11) | 50% (5/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (43/30) | 43% (10/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (361/323) | 47% (101/114) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (21/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 179 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 91 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:52 | 1:37:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 270.19 | 191 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1162/2094) | 60% (397/666) |
| 1st Serve W% | 74% (858/1162) | 68% (269/397) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (468/932) | 48% (129/269) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (93/217) | 38% (28/73) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (891/2214) | 40% (286/720) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 69% (20/9) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (19/30) | 50% (5/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 41% (17/7) | 29% (7/2) |
Gianluca Mager Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
David Goffin
Player
Gianluca Mager
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Gianluca Mager
51%
(
42 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Gianluca Mager
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gianluca Mager
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
44
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Gonzalo Bueno
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Goncalo Oliveira
Player
Gianluca Mager
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Kaito Uesugi
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Yunseong Chung
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Ji Sung Nam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mager Vs Nam Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
